Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Yuval is reading too much in the AI business if you ask me AI is a like a dream … ytc_UgxXKn0L7… G To be fair AI could not only wipe out the working class, but humanity at large.… ytc_Ugw3qaGaK… G It is crazy how Tesla started the whole self driving craze, but now is considere… ytc_UgwHKSD-o… G "You will have your God, and you will make him with your own hands." -Morpheus, … ytc_UgzykZUMG… G This significantly downplays the after effects of what is possible and is making… ytc_UgxdoCbYW… G Disgusting, he made the weapons that killed the most children in any war since W… ytc_UgwP1C0Md… G Its simple human physiology. The reaction time of a human is well understood. Th… ytr_UgyJOb7ZA… G Humans are special but not magic. What AI does is lower the bar to entry on some… ytr_Ugxx5fXsc…

Comment

I have thought about Artificial Intelligence, and the only issue I see with AI is copyrights. Someone used AI to create a picture and tried to copyright or get a patent on it, claiming the author was AI. The patent office refused (good call) and said they had to use the owner's name. But that is just for now; what if they sue in court and get it ruled the other way? I think it would be constitutional and necessary to add one item to the US Public Law on Copyrights. Please just add a definition to the word "authors" to say that "author" is to be defined as human. You must be human to copyright something (even if created by a computer). That way, any output from AI (image, picture, song, voice, science, math) cannot be copyrighted; only a human can copyright the output, thus the copyright would apply to a person. Copyright law (Title 17, U.S.C.) does not define the word "author," so just define it as human. The solution is to update the copyright laws to define "author" as human only. That is the fix.

youtube 2026-01-26T15:4…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	government
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	fear
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgyWzT12xg_qGpsSmWd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKOBoil55AuXwK8rR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFboJu57rPVIuQEBR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUwsb9c2oj0ZM4n1h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1hMmNuf5tMAypDGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGh7pN4tj6WRuh2RB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQPLKagYVoUZMGF6x4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxXajnFzIcytuYTmt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjPRaUGC8Bku-ODSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0yZ1hUB-w6dPHSdV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses