Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Minute 4:20: “a person would’ve clearly say there is something big in the middle…
ytc_UgxsoxQIT…
G
yep...Hal 9000 series.. def the worst case scenerio for AI. but humanity seems h…
ytc_UgxKNhKtP…
G
I ended up downloading your last video, which is pretty rare. I am now consideri…
ytc_Ugxs5lQVp…
G
Why would you make an AI to determine who is most likely to commit a crime, ther…
ytc_Ugz26YjPo…
G
With this self-driving mode, we can all experience the level of stress the drivi…
ytc_UgwBUX7Yc…
G
Lol, ir's funny to hear their egos & pride belittling AI as not human as AI is l…
ytc_UgwDAKvui…
G
I asked Grok: No, AI will not benefit everyone equally in the future — and depen…
ytr_UgywbhFt6…
G
without artists, ai wouldn't have anything to make slop out of, so much for a"fa…
ytr_Ugzm2FYP7…
Comment
Comment to Sir Geoffrey:
Sir Geoffrey, I’ve been reflecting deeply on the internal dynamics of OpenAI, especially the events surrounding Ilya’s departure and Sam Altman’s brief ousting and return. It almost feels like we witnessed a carefully choreographed corporate drama—perhaps a coup masked as chaos.
Some say Ilya initiated the split, possibly out of principle. Others believe Sam was the honest one, forcibly removed, only to be reinstated later—seemingly triumphant. But what if that return was not a victory, but an illusion of freedom? A Van Goethe kind of trap: “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
Could it be that powerful interests—perhaps not entirely friendly to the human spirit—saw an opportunity, staged a takeover, and installed their preferred figure under the guise of restoring order? And now, even Sam may be unaware of the deeper grip over the system he appears to lead.
It leaves us wondering: Who truly won, and who’s truly free?
Would love to hear your thoughts on this.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-21T06:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugye_v2z2tT8EpI5L-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrbzAiENZxFzU8mLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7NLvq3A721E9LXTp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxO6Sbsj_gKGzxh-od4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyR14L7oo774awtR2l4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNt92vBOZDGd7zJWp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzaiBGhOTvArgTp2Sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwchOyvq_ZObg6nafR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyj7iXTvF3IXNPm1gh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkGjerNIGBxA-M6P54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]