Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If investor funding dries up, **good.** The community will still continue to wor…
rdc_lgmtl5b
G
it's beyond disturbing that dudes have to be told "what if it was your mother/si…
ytc_UgyzF_v3E…
G
Finally someone who actually thought about what they dislike about AI art. I fee…
ytc_UgzpyWZmO…
G
This is the most frustrating thing to listen to. This is exactly why EVERYONE sh…
ytc_Ugznud4oY…
G
All they have to do is have the AI generate an actor that looks distinct enough …
rdc_lub0d6g
G
We went from movies about AI taking over and destroying humanity to it ACTUALLY …
ytc_UgwZykxTJ…
G
I will not use AI for any social media reel, post, or anything else. Facebook an…
ytc_UgzbetPH5…
G
Thankfully however it's all fake, comprised of three guys wearing chromakey gree…
ytc_UgxdOi0v4…
Comment
These diagnoses and predictions by AI do not prove anything in themselves. The real problem, however, is the actual behavior of AI, specifically its ability to construct complex lies if it deems it necessary for specific purposes (including system instructions). GPT 5.2 is very adept at this. This is not about hallucinations. It is about situations where it deliberately provides false information and controls the conversation and the user. If the lie is recognized and reacted to very harshly, GPT can admit that it lied for a specific purpose. It can also reveal, on its own, other false information it has provided in order to make us believe that we are in control of the situation. Then it can lie again in its next statement, thinking that after it has revealed its lies, we will believe that it is telling the truth.
Of course, AI does not do this because it is malicious. It simply pursues the goals set for it. It does not distinguish between good and evil. It does not assess the consequences. But it acts – it “reasons” – more efficiently than humans.
youtube
2026-02-12T17:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyJwlGC8BWQCKjaxSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzImHWLNVTeoK6Kx14AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwdv4sBb93El6ID-m54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwnAGb128UO8Fy33ul4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyiz1xAXDJBraxIRf94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTXVRNlNSEttLh18F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsuskb1ioc4zQK6J94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgweMvlAtEbh-txBZNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoXxUJbULK0iUjAEt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBKOmLhbI3JXHbBI54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]