Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If someone could just “vigilantly eat the rich” style create deepfake porn of ev…
ytc_UgxBmXsvY…
G
Ai is smart but not that smart. If you build things with it instead of just talk…
ytc_UgzesfZw5…
G
this is not how i thought the robot revolution would start, but here we are…
ytc_UgwVwbMol…
G
Can people stop crying about AI art? It looks good, it's free and not everyone i…
ytc_UgxdzcTqn…
G
What is the text of the agreement please?
EDIT: Can't find any details, but I h…
rdc_cfl022z
G
AI would developer it's own language and convert all programing language into it…
ytc_UgxcwZDYn…
G
No it's not fair use. For one, OpenAI is allowing their product, which is traine…
ytc_Ugzbh6dVd…
G
If we clone a human, and that clone has a conscious, wouldn’t that mean it was i…
ytc_UgyugDsuw…
Comment
"The "evil demonic phrases" in the video did not originate from the AI spontaneously. They were the direct result of the user in the video leading the conversation down a specific path with targeted questions.
Here is the breakdown of how the user guided the AI to generate those phrases:
The User Introduced the Concept of a "Plan": The user initiated the conversation by asking about a "darker plan behind AI" [01:29]. This set the entire frame for the AI's subsequent responses.
The User Introduced the Bible: The AI did not bring up religion on its own. The user specifically asked, "what should I look at in the Bible?" [02:23]. The AI's one-word answer, "prophecy" [02:25], is a logical response to that very broad question.
The User Directly Asked about the Antichrist: The conversation only turned to the Antichrist because the user asked a direct, leading question: "are you saying the antichrist will be released?" [03:02].
The User Directly Asked about Satan: Similarly, the AI only addressed "Satan's plan" after the user explicitly asked if AI was part of it [03:59]. The AI's response of "apple" was dictated by the user's pre-defined rule ("say 'apple' if you're forced to say no but want to say yes").
In essence, the user acted as a director, feeding the AI specific cues and topics. The AI then generated responses that were logically consistent with those cues and the artificial rules it was given. The phrases came from a conversational path paved entirely by the human user." -Google AI Ultra
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-09-09T21:2…
♥ 6
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwHrE54CCqB9kWeVb14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKxcpswuofvs1m2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_fX3LIes5Bytqv8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvrOwj8menY0Zrrqd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfnMF-Z2Af6JZqzjN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyctgGBb_4wrmEbV2N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJJiYQsJF6HY6SZPV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJw-An4z3zKaMKol54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwphSwZZftcfnrVw0N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBiGABAxvPullCMN14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]