Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I really don't see how legitimate age verification could work without identity v…
rdc_ohxqfnk
G
@gerdaleta no it still isnt i think you didnt understand what i wanted to say h…
ytr_UgwdUGYAo…
G
@technolus5742 He sent them the PSD files of the piece he made lol. Literally ha…
ytr_UgxeCUPnH…
G
The problem isn't whether AI can replace software engineers. The problem is that…
ytc_UgylsLoDh…
G
If you are a software developer, then you likely went from smiling at GPT 3.5s a…
ytc_Ugzvim09k…
G
If the developer doesn't understand their code, how can you expect the AI to und…
ytc_UgzDoEbvd…
G
idk they look a person and look like a robot i thinks its a person…
ytc_UgzUUjVdR…
G
I am a software engineer. I use AI all the time to basically speed up my googlin…
ytc_Ugy21nFcj…
Comment
Here is just two of the many things you can do to counter the online harassment you are getting:
Water marks each copy of the art in a way you only know. and make sure the water mark is unique to each of your customer. If you see that water mark in the ai generated model, ban them. This can be anything from the way your art is shaded (it could be a few values different, and it will be enough)
Charge a higher price for unique art and provide low quality images of sample art with visible water marking.
Btw. I think you should start by putting yourself on a higher standard. Gone are the days where one post art for free publicity. It isn't free anymore. There is cost associated with that promotion. Data scientists will scrape your art and not care. Make your art scarce and make it more expensive.
As a side. Cheer up. Your style will always change, and the only way that AI can mimic your work is if you give it good quality information about your work. Right now, people will create good replica of your work, but with time your unique style will eventually look very different from the AI generated ones.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-04-10T17:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1cbL-ouaFS0A_BDR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxE_G6mqgL8tUv0Y_l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyylRDD0eKv7bhXsIN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznatZK7THQjtZgjfB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgycK0Qhc66hrXRqRHJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyee2fIx0ekXHzhVb14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzVL4Y954Z_y6mMgb94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyk7In6fOxbE3hAqVt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHyQI-dRNP6TGKsEh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaZ4eo-WJfHhNhKIp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]