Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Anything A.I is a very bad idea, even call centers can't get it right, as for gi…
ytc_UgwuyXhCf…
G
The problem is, good logo designers are really expensive if you want something b…
ytc_Ugz6MaYAR…
G
As someone who is a strong AI enthusiast, and user, he makes some great points. …
ytc_UgxqS7gzt…
G
It hasn't even been three years since the first chatbot went public. Look around…
ytc_Ugws_z7tj…
G
Slow down,AI is just regurgitating what we show it. The plus side,AI will eventu…
ytc_Ugx_-p84C…
G
I'm sure I have a movie exactly about this that didn't end well. Will Smith star…
ytc_UgwsFrdqK…
G
To not recognize the layers in the multi-layeredness of artificial intelligence …
ytc_UgzpNq2A0…
G
This is just hype, AI can be self aware but he cannot replicate itself in my fli…
ytc_Ugw0s0rBU…
Comment
I think using AI to try and "explain" religious debates is pathetic. Religion is inherently HUMAN, we made the concept, and only we as a species have evolved to the point to question from where we came from, and it cannot be stripped of it's natural identity. AI has no place whatsoever to be debating on subjects we, as humanity, should be figuring out ourselves. If we want to know what the answer is, we cannot and will not rely on AI to do it for us.
Whoever says that all human debates on religion are aggressive and always have a form of bullying, either have not participated in an emotionally intelligent debate or has not listened to one. Just because your sources and past experiences are wrong and undeniably rude does not mean all are like that. And in no way, no country, no shape or form or idea, should our conversations be dumbed down into an AI debate.
I only clicked on this video to see if anyone would stand against AI being used, but I was unpleasantly surprised to see everyone praising it. I am dumbfounded.
youtube
2025-11-08T19:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgywbTQnDqhl4ohQcSF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvvPuK3IfF81EVkNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuLdhrOeWC0zPmYTt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkBr0ezCsNi3AaE554AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0sDLzjIu66kWBoZt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxhGFmA0XIuTLKtRYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEHuTz5PI38J89vjd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXT7IhaRay0V32KmJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGxpcL71F6Bt0wmgd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxfXU34O9PNUSoJ0SB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]