Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Do they realize that this is data at the AI will retrieve at some point and use …
ytc_UgxyFESf2…
G
We appreciate your engagement with the video! It's fascinating to see differing …
ytr_UgzirNCkk…
G
I can't express enough how much I hate this AI art situation and defenders of sl…
ytc_Ugz51RwEa…
G
That's why I don't believe in age of Ultron storyline, like your AI born couple …
ytc_UgztJyeEe…
G
@Yousaiditwasyesterday If there is a high enough influx of plumbers, where the s…
ytr_UgzUuIQ4b…
G
But we also need AI to boost productivity. And if it’s not using chatgpt, then w…
ytr_UgxeqjQ7T…
G
“Why you cant rely 100% on tesla autopilot” BRUH THEY SAY TO STILL PAY ATTENTION…
ytc_Ugz5asrKs…
G
How did you get a Waymo? I'm in Phoenix, want to get the experience but the app …
ytc_Ugzs1xt-T…
Comment
Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics are a set of rules designed to govern the behavior of robots in his science fiction stories: 1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; 2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; 3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. These laws, first introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", have become a foundational concept in the field of robotics and science fiction.
Here's a breakdown of each law:
1. First Law:
This is the most important law, prioritizing the safety of humans. A robot must not intentionally harm a human or allow a human to be harmed due to the robot's inaction.
2. Second Law:
This law establishes that robots should obey human commands, with the caveat that these commands must not contradict the First Law.
3. Third Law:
This law dictates that a robot should protect its own existence, but only as long as doing so doesn't violate the First or Second Law. In other words, a robot's self-preservation is secondary to the safety of humans and obeying their commands.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-16T11:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyPaudX0VKOtSBdarN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLHY0nCGHMlpU3zM54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAru9ozhl7WWrpvrl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0-ZhZl96LGV-GqFV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNNAFsz0saNWt9u-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvgyDGo5HUMS9eP0V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_FfVzpnmcm5oXkOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwyshk3KrBZkbfNETF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-YuRpi8hxCUs5dKB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzanz6SU_KEfB52SC14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]