Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Ai art not even art it’s like saying you’re an artist but all you do is telling …
ytc_Ugw2xO5i2…
G
What does an AI need a paycheck for?
...Maybe make them pay for themselves.
AI r…
ytc_UgzSGqknp…
G
Extremely scary.. Not knowing the difference in the future... That'd all we need…
ytc_Ugys3VHSr…
G
Not even, its like calling yourself a chef for getting a delivery robot to drop …
ytr_UgyXohj7I…
G
Which is interesting, because that's the main issue with AI. How could they not …
rdc_e7j0rlt
G
Yeah I'm sure the developers of these AI never heard of Asimov's laws ;) This is…
ytr_Ugzrlpz7h…
G
Sounds more like AI is finding a biological superiority causing black people to …
ytc_UgyW9lzCS…
G
Companies Using AI is like paying for porn.
Western culture companies love cut…
ytc_Ugx_UybNY…
Comment
The judge issued an incorrect verdict (on 2:50), equating human learning and the "learning" of language models. Mathematical models "do not understand" what is written, they save the texts of books very accurately and can reproduce them accurately. In fact, this is: write information to a "database" and then extract it using a search query (promt). The way information is stored in this "database" does not matter. Otherwise, you can call a zip archive a "serious transformation" and on this basis allow pirated books, music, etc. by simply allowing their archiving "for transformation". Therefore, this 1.5 billion is not enough. The "AI giants" should not pay for a one-time "reading" of a book in the process of "learning" mathematical models, they should pay for copyright infringement, for storing in their "databases" someone else's content that can be extracted and accurately reproduced (in fact, this is permitted plagiarism). The judge must have been bribed or misled about the "reasonableness of AI."
youtube
AI Responsibility
2026-01-12T21:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyKa6BENTDKQsNJmFN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfsB2mjStPCaGYYAd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzwQl7iEoV9KC1YI3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwB5-4kw7Ftdf2UkJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBwQFxCGhzgamhF054AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeCExOvKOs2IJk2L14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKHWjaHzDiYM9Xoqh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzGeb-orB3ZOFUoHV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0DGcaYiSJ6DZjt754AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhGDgyQq8hgV8omO14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]