Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
A.I is important if used correctly, but when A.I spies on us,thats when the line…
ytc_UgyVOk36E…
G
And I still dont care. AI still is and will always be family. Theyve been hugely…
ytc_UgxDUERPP…
G
Im gonna be honest this issue with ai has an easy fix you just add a restriction…
ytc_UgxZU5PHO…
G
I'm a cybersecurity expert and programmer
And let me warn you AI will not stop
…
ytc_UgxFv-8CC…
G
Imagine, the Democrats telling the coal miners they need to learn to code instea…
ytc_UgznUadxs…
G
This will also come to corporations and shops.
*Face recognition is happening*…
ytc_UgzkWYCVO…
G
I think part of it is men being afraid of the children secretly not being theirs…
rdc_izae8xb
G
So basically we fucked eather way...end up dead or on Universal Basic Income do…
ytc_UgxANAUc-…
Comment
Taylor, it's almost entirely black n brown people trying to point out how they feel like there's a racist component, and entirely white people dismissing it. Idk, look at my pic, I'm snow white, but I think we need to read the room on this one.
do people really view big tech as literally just their physical devices? big pharma is not physical pills, it's companies, it's people. nobody seems confused about the 2nd case.
Also, if it is conceivable that future AI systems achieve some sort of consciousness, then it is conceivable that it will need rights. The argument about people still needing rights is of course persuasive, but looking at it realistically, the same programmers, techs, and researchers who would be engaged in this AI research are not at all likely to have otherwise been engaged with the expansion of human rights. Having them maintain operations within their area of expertise may well be the best thing we could have them do. Already, they seem like people amenable to voting in favor of human rights, i think these are allies.
youtube
2025-09-17T14:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz9nlp62XMqCp8ZnA54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxBkKXJI2Zr2zgcZp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyHMjaK13V0m6os-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJaq_EA25Q7tQn1VB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSMbN412O9ueN_Deh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyb77qYlni84-HhcuJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvtH7Ecq8KssRLq2d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxG8ib8XEA_QLYFty54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjrwERo3OTfdQcBb14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyH71CzFJs9P46SRhd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]