Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G The A.I. people are trying to sell their book before they run out of money. The… ytc_UgyccLMQK… G I'm pretty sure that would be stalking and you would need to prove that there is… ytc_Ugy15H1mD… G The way they abused their workers.I can only see these robot employees being the… ytc_UgwcyV0Ws… G it is complete copying, if an artist got inspired by say starwars, they would ma… ytc_UgxVKyDNB… G @ukkc4355 In what way are they logical fallacies, the only one i commited is Ad … ytr_UgymsRXhB… G These people are just riding a hype train. On one hand, you have those who go ar… ytc_Ugwukw3gN… G am i the only person who thinks that ai is a big scam. chat gpt ist stupid as fu… ytc_Ugzor8o6j… G ChatGPT can explain terrible jokes to you and you can share that answer with eve… rdc_kuasboa
Comment
A common consumer takes time to view an article, that view = an interaction, that interaction provides monetary value for the Times through ad revenue/subscriptions. These articles have years of research, time, trail&error and money to key in on these interactions. A bot/ai essentially ctrl cs the article. This is not a view. This does not provide the Times monetary value or the 3rd party ad interactions. Openai has essentially committed corporate sabotage by using an algorithm to synthesize the formula the Times uses to accumulate these interactions by scraping millions of articles. The ai does not research the topic, or spend money to do so, the ai does not provide credit, the ai does not count as a view, the ai does not transform the work, the ai acts as a bypass between the user and the answer without the responsibility, therefore the ai could misinform through paraphrase, misunderstanding and through inaccurate information. And unlike a common user who can be informed, no you are wrong, no one can know/tell the ai it is wrong until it spirals.
youtube AI Responsibility 2026-04-11T14:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgwkW8ldZfltITG8uD54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx6ZfhmA9OVM4AZ88x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwqKiE1VtnpjQ1Y02p4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgylbZR-4kpiRgNYEtV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwXZwOjiOM4DPvrPPN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy4cPnmC3DwpGDiM014AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugybbi7YNazQdP5Stip4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugys1EKgK7MFwOFKzn94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwU1U5N2Jjuz54XzWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyI7QXdNi-950CDw2V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]