Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Prend to sac à main sort dans la rue. Encore un qui croit au mythe de la révolu…
ytr_Ugx4YviYO…
G
To pay for UBI, governments should apply a special tax for companies that use AI…
ytc_UgxhHPNen…
G
Comparing my experience, OSVue's AI manages calls more effectively than I ever c…
ytc_Ugx72upDl…
G
Are you seriously going to click in this video everyday and spamming your passiv…
ytr_UgzG9o-P3…
G
Well that leave Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.
North Kor…
rdc_jrzfa1p
G
AI is all hype to drive up the bubble. Once the world realises that AI can’t re…
ytc_UgziPP3Ex…
G
The only problem is humans would have to manually go through and remove sexist a…
ytc_Ugynlt-9M…
G
I don’t know why a bigger deal hasn’t been made about the inevitable convergence…
ytc_Ugw49cVqO…
Comment
True, but I feel like I’m backtracking on my previous preferences. For example, I used to use automated cashiers, but not anymore. At first they were great;no queues, fast, convenient. Now they’ve become the norm, there are long lines anyway, and on top of that I have to bag everything myself. If I buy something “non standard,” I still end up waiting for a human to come over. So I’ve stopped using them and even avoid places that don’t offer a choice.The same goes for many other services: I’d rather talk to a human. Ideally, we’ll find a balance between human interaction and automation. Maybe “augmented” human workers could be the answer, with people acting as supervisors. Or perhaps ethical committees could act as overseers. And there’s also the chance that AI never reaches the level its promoters claim. Maybe we’ll hit a plateau. After all, AI still depends on humans to learn, doesn’t it? Otherwise, it’s like making a photocopy of a photocopy, the quality gradually deteriorates instead of improving.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-09-10T10:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzuDqxXOp7FTT7O_yx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwrmVuKe-7c2nqfXel4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFOd6-6QQjWeYDzZh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_KDvn32w0NPWLn2Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxgbJE6nZoMnTH1H-54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzotds6n7Mvyvv_nbx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWPcjsWfKuzLxbLtl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwOJzOuWZ_IKveOL2F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyEa454vd6pmlRf9vZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQqIo5KZChmT5RAI14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]