Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI has massive potential for art. To deny this is to deceive yourself.
AI visual…
ytc_UgwxTC8HH…
G
I'm finna make robot pets, only for security reasons, IF YOU WANT PETS GET A REA…
ytc_Ugwsepvgy…
G
Such an interesting discussion! I've always been very anti AI and sometimes stru…
ytc_UgzubdM5f…
G
One thing. How in the year of 2024+ surveillance and AI in the victim's phone, a…
ytc_Ugz5vTU7V…
G
@milesgrooms7343 ChatGPT does that all the time, regardless of the subject. "If …
ytr_UgyfA0fEJ…
G
I work with training AI so that these aspects are improved, such as hallucinatio…
ytc_UgxNL1nHC…
G
Hey @JamesWood3239, thanks for your comment! It's amazing how computers have evo…
ytr_Ugy_2OxNR…
G
AI is overhyped. A lot of fearmongering for clicks. Firings aren't mainly becaus…
ytc_Ugzn2UcCX…
Comment
I love how sometimes the red AI said some misinformation or misunderstanding about a certain concept and the blue AI instead of explaining why that is misinformation, it tries to justify the reason for why that info is the way it is as if it wasn't a misinfo.
For example when red AI used the flat earth as an example to support his point claiming that god actually said that. The blue one defended the flat Earth concept as if god for real said that, not that ppl misinterpreted it or misunderstood it, and those who still use that argument to this day are so ignorant and not up to date with what was explained or disproved. Just as if you get a scientist from a millennium ago and let him explain to you his discoveries that are so outdated and some of his concepts have been disproved or expanded upon already, making his limited knowledge on the matter so invalid because it is an incomplete knowledge. Same as judging someone for a seemingly bad behavior without knowing full context of it. If I said this person killed someone and ended the sentence here. Everyone would say f that killer. But when I add further information by saying, this person killed someone who tried to steal him or hurt his wife in self defense. Then suddenly all previous hatred shifts towards the other person after the new given info.
And I've noticed in many arguments that the red AI made that it was based on unconfirmed or info that was proved wrong but the blue AI answers by reasoning why they are the way the red Ai claimed they are, instead of correcting the misconception that the red AI had to begin with, which is kinda lame considering if I was a lawyer defending a killer who killed out of self defense and I don't mention that he actually killed for self defense but instead trying to justify his act of killing by saying he wasnt in the right mind even tho saying the truth about it being self defense is much better and solid than justifying his actions by saying he wasnt in the right mind or he has been going through a lot in his life so he couldn't control himself from killing the other person.
youtube
2025-10-03T16:1…
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwRuEeiLnoUD4uYAKZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9LPZIZ1KgW-5rDSF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw8kN0LMEvf3ztV16F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzcdIMx9YSWgXbpAF94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbRLrAJ7N34JaWLE14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQj1mK3DEVhXeuNkR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypuUn-EiuXx9DV45J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2tJ5az1RRyfMdVrN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxbpa11Xf8lsbpyluV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHlQebV3s1G6msEGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]