Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You should have Ed Zitron to talk about AI, for contrast. So far there have been…
ytc_Ugx6JW2R5…
G
The discussion of AI mostly brushes over the definition of intelligence whatsoev…
ytc_UgyH1UCa9…
G
Of course they know what is ‘going on under the hood’ humans designed the algori…
ytc_UgxIXkaVB…
G
I'm with you on this one. AI has made us more efficient but we still need human …
rdc_kz0s14i
G
Structural unsound for a few CEO/elites to control tech companies, but that is w…
ytc_UgxHQsh4K…
G
Who remembers the movie upgrade? Yeah kind of feels like that doesn’t it. Give i…
ytc_UgzleI4yR…
G
The long hairy robot is totally out of his depth and didn't understand what was …
ytc_Ugz6x9rrK…
G
Can we take ai to space to get the work and tasks done that human are unable to …
ytc_Ugz0xqw30…
Comment
A "tool" is something that is in some way physically manipulated. You USE a tool, you don't TELL a tool what to do. I agree that perhaps using AI makes someone and "Art Director", but as it was stated, and art director does not hold claim to the art...the ARTIST does. On that note, AI "art" is not under copyright...if the computer generated it, it CAN'T be copyrighted. So I would say that ANYONE can take an AI image no matter who "prompted" it's creation and make prints to sell. Do these so called AI artists even consider that? IF AI changes something substantially and should not be considered to infringe on the artist, then the drawings Shad uses to prompt his AI may be protected, but the resulting image is NOT. AI changed it and a computer cannot hold a copyright. ANYONE can take his generated works and sell them (so long as they don't contain IP such as "Supergirl"). You cannot say both: that AI changes are significant enough to elude copyrighted work AND I am the artist and thus hold the copyright to the work generated. Also, perfect ending to this vid.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-11-11T04:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgwjJKR-Nzp4T0_BlAF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-7yDjUJx3QZsfHqZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCM7D-NjL-mzA31Jx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwM5d6MS4oXK30hIIB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzdtVp5ZyqnmRKZUx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzw1L0j8TDn8VcXVq14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwiMouJGQkvOjVEVrh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPQWehJNWXGrUzYJJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzip5xIdYj_0TEqOXx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"ban","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyPTcr6mugGb3vHSTt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}]