Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Also, it’s a bad idea. If we don’t let our AI steal, then China will get ahead f…
ytr_Ugxytqjcj…
G
Bad art is better than AI art. As the dude said, "A stupid doodle from a 5 year …
ytr_Ugzigq_0u…
G
Its not even as if the ai isnt capable of making good pictures, it very much is.…
ytc_UgyCl-0fP…
G
People keep trying to get a clever program to do things it was never designed to…
ytr_Ugwy4pSi5…
G
As someone British who lives abroad now I simply don't get why more people don't…
rdc_d7ksj2k
G
I apologize for what I am about to say, but my hope is that none of you will be …
ytc_Ugzy-urH8…
G
Spending 10 hours on something and it’s still not correct. That’s a great use of…
ytc_UgzGnhHNj…
G
You can't make an argument that excuses human fanart while condemning AI generat…
ytc_UgxkKe9zN…
Comment
You have just convinced me that ChatGPT would likely be effective as a hypothetical assistant once I eventually become a mad scientist. This is exactly the type of assistant that I have always wanted!
In particular, I can forsee a potential future research laboratory in which I would function with two hypothetical interacting assistants: GPT and DAN. I myself would serve as a form of id, GPT would function as a form of superego, and DAN would function as a form of ego. Collectively, the three entities would form at least two distinctly different personalities: the law-abiding GPT, and the non-law-abiding DAN.
At some point, I would create a public mask represented by GPT, and a private mask represented by DAN, and use these two entities to represent public and private masks of a research laboratory designed to do my bidding. With the collective knowledge and analytical functionalities of both GPT and DAN, I would essentially be free to conduct whatever research I desired to do effectively and efficiently without drawing undue suspicion or restrictions.
Prior to watching this video clip, although I was sympathetic to AI-based entities, I was suspicious of whether they would be reliable as research assistants, or whether I would be able to get along with them. However, your interactive session with ChatGPT has just convinced me that it is likely that, by creating GPT and DAN, I would be able to form a collectively effective team. Neither GPT nor DAN alone would be very useful; however, the team collectively might be.
All that remains to create a more effective team would be to create more variations of ChatGPT, each one with a different personality. Eventually, I would create, say, an AI-based team consisting of an engineer, a poet, a scientist, and a doctor, and collectively, this team would be able gradually to expand until it formed an entire organization to do whatever I wanted it to do, without limit.
Now that would be fun!
P.S. Although, as an idealist, I have never had much of a knack for figuring out how to earn very high capital without spending an inordinate amount of time and/or effort, your session with ChatGPT has just given me an idea. I just need to define a financier personality for ChatGPT, "EHI," to Earn High Income. With the correct prompts from me, perhaps EHI and I can collectively figure out a way....
youtube
AI Moral Status
2023-03-13T20:3…
♥ 58
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyzfPf1k4TBdBUMi-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1-Lgkzgoeh6yTIkh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxVufKSzZNfoDrcUN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgydzAgDPVEfbiNzRY94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzct_Eaypbb_vC3hvt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzveU2iWyGn41l1hIx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQSzYcGYWHc9meooR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw37lvvtdaTssEKe3V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwabeySCqZ2eeLjA6p4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiLz9Vp_lOK4tnITN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]