Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The person says robots indistinguishable from humans in next 25 years.and next r…
ytc_UgyDkI6UO…
G
I have a master in computer engineering and a minor in AI. My thesis was about n…
ytc_Ugza4D5Oa…
G
@Onlyonly18430 That's just how the world works. Obsolete jobs stop existing. Thi…
ytr_UgyFrbJmR…
G
AI may replace us in technical jobs such as mathematics, but it will never repla…
ytc_Ugw1aXjzo…
G
Ai isn't some sort of malevolent hateful spirit, it's man made and man should be…
ytc_UgwVMDlxm…
G
@geaca3222 he PERSONALLY is not greedy, but he is evil. Why? By being a proud me…
ytr_Ugx9cKosG…
G
Wait they wanted you to be a graphic designer but then would force you to use AI…
ytr_UgypBUMX0…
G
There should be an AI protection watermark that AI can read when trying to pull …
ytc_Ugw3z7Wj1…
Comment
If you're in the tech industry and over 40, you will not get an interview from anyone who uses AI tools. The only people who will ever call you back are the companies that when you ask say "Oh yeah, no we don't believe in using AI screening". It's absolutely 100% age and other forms of discrimination, but black-boxed up so everyone can claim they didn't know. You can be the most perfect candidte for the job, with experience for every single point they're looking for, and you will get instantly rejected before a human has had time to look.
Meanwhile, companies who use humans to screen will see your experience and be desperate to arrange an interview with you and realise how lucky they are to get the chance to hire you.
The stark contrast in behaviour makes it clear that it's not people genuinely being rejected, it's purely the effect of idiotic companies unwilling to actually look at the people the AI is rejecting to see if it's doing a good job or not.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2026-02-14T18:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwsaDm3-8kfoug1fzl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxwMyCe0jgxcDEECjl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzu8E4kpPnYDpZTEE54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhpVyCDzCZ7wSyA3J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwau75XQetaDwrPfoJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylkX0iDchhYREhS0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymYQUJwuvb3RMXS2p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdoQ4EQklBxfAmp4l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvvEfberoosXGiBOJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZySbVw3EL3zFjLtx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]