Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I refuse to accept ChatGPT or any AI as the IRL version of Spongebob's Magic Con…
rdc_mtqf3yl
G
This is a garbage notion. AI is not capable of feeling. I have been watching AI …
ytc_UgyFymTUy…
G
Shad's whole thing is that he believes himself to be the smartest man in the roo…
ytc_UgzhcZ8gA…
G
Character ai is a website where you can talk with ai's , you can choose with who…
ytr_Ugxd_tUc8…
G
I always planned on posting my art online eventually. But recent AI policies, sp…
ytc_UgwprfGwz…
G
"I don't know how a man with so much wealth he could never possibly spend it all…
ytc_UgwBmaabQ…
G
Chat that’s fake, I know you asked AI but it’s fake guys, The end of the world w…
ytc_UgxIH7mnU…
G
Before true sentient artificial intelligence happens, many scientists predict th…
ytc_Ugz_WZU3j…
Comment
In my daily practice, AI is good at analysing existing code. It can answer questions about the how and even the why. It's good at reverse engineering. It's decent at mentoring juniors who want to get into the code.
With good prompts, and pointed questions, it can give you insights in seconds, it can re-do and improve existing code in a blink, but you have to have a plan and execute it piecemeal fashion or else the AI gets lost in the weeds.
Ask it to create a new feature from some natural language "specification" and it's going to mostly fail. It's introducing bugs, it's using a jumble of old and new features, it's adding useless and verbose code, it's missing details that were in the spec! It's the wrong way to use AI. If you have a template and your code is some kind of rinse and repeat with small variations then it will shine. As soon as variations are needed, it will go nuts and you'll waste your time.
In short, AI is absolutely not the silver bullet big tech has advertised.
Fools are those who fell for it.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-03-24T13:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw8rNkzQnwt2EGMn8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGcHMgXYu0uEUy6594AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwK-F3qOJH12YtISQZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWESVO78YkwfJPprt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzBKeH_VqX41psyn8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwm4Kw5maprCP_Sea54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsA0vhmt0MkKQZ1_54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3iXihBLBSQklp0DF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0mWjN91fagaY27iV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7qPlLL58OeT6GNul4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]