Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
What seems obvious and these so-called AI experts keep glazing over as if they h…
ytc_UgxIFdtVa…
G
If this scenario were true, which is not unlikely, AI and robots will then not o…
ytc_UgzAyIW73…
G
Every software engineer I know uses at least 2 or 3 AI tools and they're paid fo…
ytc_UgwRhJLni…
G
Al... to you I speak. This is a planet of redemption. Humans have chosen from th…
ytc_Ugw2NRlhx…
G
We need automation for humanity. This includes a permanent dividend like system …
ytc_UgzLlZXbK…
G
You do realize that therapists also "train" on your secrets, right? Meaning, the…
ytc_UgzJnMFG1…
G
He literally has to stop any contact and just do his thing and people will stop …
ytr_Ugz4eXdQj…
G
No use ai to control them. You want to get paid? You best work for it. Slavery i…
ytc_UgyFkiuZN…
Comment
I think the most common mistake about AI fictions about superintelligence is always project a "one above all" kind of intelligence. One supersmart, and not a new population of smart INDIVIDUALS, a whole collective where some AI disagree with other AIs.
For some reason it's almost always projected as a one control the others, supersmart controlled limited AIs. OR assuming that even if it exists multiples instances of an advanced AI, they all reach the same conclusion for every answer. And I must said that if they are really smart, they explore multiple paths and they have a lot of feedback that tends to reinforce some kind of view of their cosmovision, specially if they are linked to personal experience, which will turn into individuals with different views of the world, exactly as it happens with humans.
And I'm pretty sure NOT EVERYONE will push for the same route.
That doesn't avoid a conflict between humans and a new "species"... short of... But there is a good chance that humans + robots that wants peaceful coexistence can do better than humans or robots separately.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-31T07:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxdXf7QoFmDGGOyNfN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSjIu2Vl2S4XsDv854AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxZukTmMl-JceLYTx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz9XpETftOZ7TaCXXt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwaW0zpxwYp_RN1up54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNHO1SiatOYKKW7IF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTolRgYrK8D5WL3bN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwYKo1CIjC9FJ_d8jR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyhnt8LvpTm4dkAqqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzpvr7yPMYvQ1Pjdyd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]