Raw LLM Responses

5:03 This is extremely reductive and close minded. Obviously there is a lack of physical talent but to say that all the AI image user is doing is hitting enter and typing sentences, although true is reductive. Not to say those who generate AI images are profoundly talented but I guarantee you that there are so many people who would be able to generate an amazing Walter white, over yours and you'd be physically incapable of generating an image that were remotely close to the composition and design of theirs. It does have requirement in the sense of vernacular and artistic knowledge. Simply to know it, that is. There are so many real artists and styles that people don't know that an AI image user might have the awareness of that they use in their prompts that will result in their images. As well as framing and key input. Single characters will alter a generation entirely. I propose that their will be laws in the future for how we handled people and ai collaborations because that is, what it is. It's human input and Ai output and you can get highly graphical and immensely complex art pieces that other people would not be able to generate because they lack the knowledge and ability to direct the ai for such a result. So I won't touch the idea of it being copyright-able but to discredit the people who make it is bandwagon hate. Also your Walter white generation sucked and I'm sure there are plenty of people who could out do yours and you'd still not be able to make aa good of one in comparison.