Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
He even went on lying he gets a lot of job offers 😂 Why would anyone pay a dime …
ytc_UgzibBSNc…
G
Tesla owner since 2020 here. Its been a great car, but I've seen the mistakes au…
ytc_UgzD7sZ_k…
G
I've seen a bunch of jobs which involve training AI, it really makes me think of…
ytr_UgyOEyRL5…
G
@jonesjeremiah It's not a good tool if it has to build upon a database of other …
ytr_UgwT6L-3M…
G
Since the 90s my grandma was subscribed to a calendar that had every month illus…
ytc_UgwSgH5Eh…
G
Ngl with people like this that don't care about others because of money i hope A…
ytc_UgySj_oOn…
G
AI bros are delusional
"Born with it" that's not how skills work...
Artists pra…
ytc_UgzLZy6Bt…
G
How about we replace dumb ass human pod cast with an AI host pod cast. Generate …
ytc_Ugzmdw6qU…
Comment
I think Alex might want to study philosophy of mind and analytical philosophy to a greater extent to make future discussions with AI more appealing. This felt more superficial than it could have been. For example, reading Searle more closely would make much of these questions for Chat GPT defunct. For example, understanding that Chat GPT utilises sintax, not semantics. My phone doesnt need to know what an app is in order to initiate a program. Humans do this as well, but also utilise a Higher Order Thinking faculty, particularly when it comes to reflecting on meaning and value. We also have sesory experience which informs our reality, another factor which severely limits the insight this video seems to be claiming.
I finished the video - when Alex askes the AI to only respond in Yes and No, he reduces the dialogue to a binary. Its the tail wagging the dog when he tries to have a conversation about consciousness using fallacies suxh as false dichotomy and reductio absurdum.
Enjoyable nevertheless
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-07-30T12:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxchB7J0p0B011_ucZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIpmZMRNXNfZPaqGp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwy3COYfHSl9uA-u-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsv4bsl3FBkT4Tp7J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx13hLZ9p51Ec72vsB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdELNJdLE5jvrv-IB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzIrhq-Gf0KF0h98C54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxPpWHwZ4V-u7Ljnd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxe2aYoDMTG9r665k14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVjewGyPHD4vLYniN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]