Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm just an amateur artist, but in my opinion these kinds of protests are counte…
ytc_UgxbJC2OM…
G
The laziness is next-level and they know people just get support from “volunteer…
rdc_o323yfh
G
Don't post original art on twitter - they added a "We will steal all images post…
ytc_UgwsJxcu8…
G
Generative ai won’t replace much of anything imo. He says it will because it’s a…
ytc_Ugx2syWYl…
G
AI has already taken over, and making millions of people suddenly unemployed is …
ytc_UgzQ0upV8…
G
People use AI for the "artwork"
I used to use it as a tool of reference or an i…
ytc_UgzR_aw_B…
G
Read "Empire of AI" by Karen Hao. Sam Altman wasn't always the way he is now. Bu…
ytc_UgwNClq8P…
G
ITS REAL EASY TO FIX THE A.I. QUESTION...............................GIVE THE A.…
ytc_UgyXNvvdb…
Comment
I’m not sure that there is that much evidence of over-hiring in tech from the Pandemic. Typically one of the better gauges of what the industry is doing is tracking the number of recruiters reaching out and the relative hourly rates being offered. These dropped dramatically in 2023, well before the current AI narratives - but it’s worth noting that the openings and rates had been consistent for nearly 10 years before that. 2020 and 2021 were not dramatically different or better.
And no company that I know of has (in about a year), has boasted about replacing workers with AI because it’s toxic to do so. I think you’ve bought into an industry PR narrative here - although you are also correct about the tech not actually being ready.
Contradictory? Not really. The perception (not reality) of AI readiness is leading to massive layoffs which aren’t being called that. And many of those people will likely be rehired. The other thing that is actually getting announced is companies cutting costs in order to fund AI capex.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-02-14T15:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwEt5MlUG2jIcZcF4d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaRK0srbK95XbRZ1F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy25rHtKOVjGbu-bON4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybqwhtwpZtoBHMYvx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAEtpvdCTtBrxOKoV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyqtTDty1rjLgCtAtF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2yhgZVTXd5hk9QqN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDZXqn5Qy2y8N1FOp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzXeWpGbRM4yYOhvxN4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxtPraVG3unuy9-0Hd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]