Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Pausing at 15 min to knee jerk react so probably off. Philosophical rigor is act…
ytc_UgyqBWaCr…
G
Yes. Better than many online and paid videos. I have gone through almost all the…
ytc_UgzUtrwbK…
G
I just want to recognize a quote from a comment saying when you give a robot mac…
ytc_UgzRmGHiw…
G
The actual scary prospect is that LLMs *are* more human-like than we realise.
T…
ytc_UgzWub3gT…
G
Bro, I hate ai art work all together. It’s just so gooey and not well drawn. You…
ytc_Ugz2iPRxa…
G
Interesting take, I think that AI will be dangerous once it has been generalized…
ytc_Ugwqe5kJm…
G
I really wish companies never made ai that can make art, cause it's an infection…
ytc_UgwS31uaS…
G
truth gpt ( not related to trump)
that destroys all misinformation
but then who…
ytc_UgwFe3sXa…
Comment
While I do fully support artists protecting their art against theft in this way, I'm not so much on board with the "Bad AI" take. Imho AI is not some supervillain trying to replace art or anything, it's just a tool. Tools themselves are neither good nor bad, how they are used by people makes the difference. Yes, it's absolute bullshit that AI companies crawl art without permission. That definitely needs to end, better sooner than later. But being able to generate pictures, e.g. for reference or to get a feeling for a certain design style that might interest me is a good thing I think, IF the training data is sourced ethically by either only using art that is specifically licensed for free use and rearrangement, OR by paying artists revenue for every time their work gets used (with their permission of course).
So tl;dr: Poisoning your art so that people can't replicate your style with AI? Hell yeah, go nuts. AI in general is bad? Nah, not really. Just needs proper use.
BTW: Amazing art, I love it <3
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-10-25T10:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwMvXuIW3J5vZmUhkR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzottNZP6A-nsr4DPl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_Imc0-ts2CGWpEWR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzflp2Hhb9It6_s8Dh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugymguu9b6FNLY7BaF94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx5yi_XXq3Tf8POngV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSLtOEj3R1BAM8doN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyEE-baQgBMxsaG1rJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAZXu25EPvoAzU8Ml4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxpUCIc4t833jX3Cnl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]