Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Everyone can make art - hell even animals can paint. Art is in the eye of the be…
ytc_Ugz16Sd5I…
G
100% it was prompted in a way to spit out an NY times article. Fun part will be …
ytc_Ugz7_1p80…
G
Should be an easy win in the court. Also: [https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/…
rdc_l60uypo
G
This whole segment was so frustrating. Krystal and Saagar are just buying into t…
ytc_Ugy5llsUC…
G
I would like to see Open Brain to play chess with an Atari 2600 1978 VCS and how…
ytc_UgwBcQNyM…
G
I remember a saying from somewhere, I don't remember what it was, but it went so…
ytc_UgyIQTMpl…
G
I can fall in love with this one over night! If she doesn't talk that is a plus.…
ytc_Ugw6PzYHG…
G
So like… can it make enough money to pay for its cloud hosting bill and have acc…
ytc_Ugz5tbkgh…
Comment
Am I missing something or would it not require businesses as a whole to willingly adopt any ai technology in order for it to be of worth and if employees decided to not work with ai the benefits could not be realized or the business as a whole would fail. Therefore it’s like having a great tool but if it’s not widely accepted because its adoption is recognized as a poison pill for the masses, it would not work as expected. If you force employees to use it or lose a job as ai embeds in business, the employees would see a zero sum game and not engage. A company can’t fire all its employees at once unless there is a guarantee of success. With ai it requires ongoing usage to learn and perfect itself so the workers have a say in how it needs to be developed and leveraged with full transparency or the economic benefits will take longer to arise and will give more opportunity for the population to become clearer on the negative impacts and become more aggressive against establishing a framework in businesses to eliminate their jobs.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-12-12T02:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzEoQcLAfOLHCUBy8V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXYG9qNLQDTTa6M8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjYkXY300ZZ5354It4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyi8k2yGmCwy-0CeKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxq2__8wlWwzDLJwOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_u-Opf6Gf8eXVecR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ6qpoeyII3W1w-Mp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxUFW4CtOJqmYuf6pt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzldA48Rz_HBGA8Ggx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw5iQaSZjJOIAvGREV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]