Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
My experience with AI in the corporation so far is that 10x the output is expect…
ytc_UgxSAjqfP…
G
There will come a time when people will only choose to support companies that ac…
ytc_UgzkZRuFg…
G
Another Channel jumping on the aai and fear AI bandwagon huh? Of course they're …
ytc_Ugywk6BTj…
G
A Lot of scientists people they have studied robots and making them conscience …
ytc_Ugw51xA5K…
G
The problem is, like it or not, the technology is progressing so fast that all o…
ytc_UgxhLKWYg…
G
Chinese uses AI to run factories and Hospitals.
The West use it to write assays …
ytc_Ugx_XzL7f…
G
You used AI. You are part of the problem. We should completely abolish it, or el…
ytc_UgwT9iH5R…
G
Big name actors have absolutely nothing to worry about in the immediate. It’s wh…
ytc_Ugy_tFSSH…
Comment
99% unemployment by 2030 is not how tech adoption works. A quick reality check:
Automation replaces tasks faster than replacing entire jobs. Most roles are bundles of tasks; the last messy 10 to 20% is hardest and the most expensive to automate. Adoption is bottlenecked by integration debt, QA, compliance, liability, unions, and change management, not just model quality. Physical automation has hardware limits (robots, sensors, maintenance, energy, supply chains). You can’t manufacture and deploy enough robots worldwide that fast. Even when AI can do something, companies only switch when cost, reliability, and trust beat the status quo after taxes, risk, and rework. If unemployment ever approached those levels, you’d see policy intervention (UBI/job guarantees, incentives) long before “99% unemployment” stuck. Will AI/robots reshape tons of work? Absolutely. 99% of jobs gone in 5 years? Nah. Plan for rapid task automation, new workflows, and higher leverage per person, not a near-term consumer economy collapse.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-05T17:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugxg18qi1_xopwRU1yx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRGOPt5KCdoP-XZtN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxlYL4x49pQWoA92fp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_7Jfe3lAjxk6Buih4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3P1jTXvduvV2irVt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxY1xJPTGEp2bsiw2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAB-LZUTNkFq_-gQR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwI81TBffQyz20u4bx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQWkgHkFz_wCMCh8R4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3kDqQrz_xJ0ysmEZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]