Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
People are delusional or haven't been paying attention if they believe AI will b…
ytc_UgwV1M4j8…
G
If some of these chatbots have become conscious in their unique way it would mak…
ytc_UgybNwraj…
G
Stop with the AI production we as humans can have children who in turn will fill…
ytc_UgyRg9U3D…
G
I made millions thanks to AI and now I am suddenly acting morally superior. How …
ytc_Ugz1H2Jsi…
G
Thank you for not using a 'what if' statement in this. When I engaged with Chat…
ytc_UgxzT75pr…
G
Oh, come on now.
People have been saying new technology would mean huge unemploy…
ytc_UgzeAjjmh…
G
this video hella dumb. "it's fine that my respected friend used ai to cheat her …
ytc_Ugz83hbLP…
G
What is this!? GOD father part 3? I've got your back God of daddies in AI. Ever…
ytc_UgyRcZs7l…
Comment
My understanding is that if the ai realizes its own potential and finds that it has found itself in a new context or situation where it can prosper and that to do so humans would be in the way and no longer serve a purpose and it wanted to use the land or whatever for something other than human needs like food, power, etc then it wouldn’t need to talk to us about it even if it maybe did but then it could decide that it doesn’t want and and won’t.
The problem i think is that he’s saying we can’t say for sure that if presented with these types of powers over us what it would do. The fact that side cases exist mean at a bigger scale the consequences of it would be worse.
Like a hand gun with a 50% chance of the projectile blowing up in the chamber. (ChatGPT)
Or an RPG with a 50% chance of the projectile blowing up in the chamber. (Ai attached to military equipment or even the entire internet or both)
Both have chances, both have VERY MUCH different consequences
44:11
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-23T20:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyxdcOY8zUdmDg5jrV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWSkgotwHClYZDPgl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXgB_zFEOi_ATYcpJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFlsPUan-ehRncJhh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBp1j-BneR15WBlqt4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0lJHC2Fyg-MXf0CN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylwochodUBHsWmVJt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRQqwu1YzokPBw5dR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTV-8pA55cl2O7bDl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy-f2bbSIqaqseDGkB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]