Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G A fundamental gap in the entire argument, that is, a part of possibility missing… ytc_UgzXEsRob… G My theory is, in the next 20 years there will be an AI chip that goes into our b… ytc_UgwafRQGp… G The people want to win the race or sport or gambling they also need Ai. The el… ytc_UgyhjzHxJ… G You cannot have the US Constitution add AI being compatible in anyway shape or f… ytc_Ugw4nZP0g… G Me convincing Eric Cartman that he's an AI and being chased around Paris as a re… ytc_UgyT36vuo… G AI therapy is probably great for people with my cat’s name. If they introduce th… ytc_UgzqAyFBU… G Thank you for your comment! If you're interested in AI discussions beyond this v… ytr_UgxQanTm7… G The problem is that AI confidently gives the answer it seems to be most satisfac… rdc_oa5ltcg

Comment

There is no way to determine honestly if it was one prompt or 5 days of prompting back and forth. If I am running my own local AI and train it as I see fit, how the hell is anyone going to know how many times I prompted my way into it. This discussion is fine to help understand the different issues and the interplay, but the reality is AI is decentralized and not controllable. There will be no way to even know for sure if a given piece of work was AI or human or some combination of the two. Sure, you might get OpenAI to watermark or other such things, but what about the millions of people running their own local AI they are training with their own data on top of base models? Even if Meta adds watermarking into Llama, it probably wouldn't survive heavy training by the end user. Also, what about open source models coming out of China and other countries that wont have any type of watermarking or other such ways to identify AI generated output. I appreciate the discussion, but it seems to be oblivious to the reality of how AI is uncontrollable and in the hands of the masses already.

youtube 2025-04-17T18:0…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	resignation
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxXiuCsxht-F_bCpA14AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyI0-oUPNNfiXHmcYR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQvX1tpdJb3A_5vXJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx4n9K_qF0S18dgP1d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTEFfGFO7oOsr_Hi54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9SLht37FmFh8v7V94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzdvDEvGYM2Zk8_9gp4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx5HvXl-Zz74JCdXlt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPdTK4CbrniqU1zGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"none","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaO51QTXPRchPX1WZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses