Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G The largest species population on Earth are ants! 20 quadrillion. If the AI was … ytc_Ugw9GL20X… G I don't man, maybe the answer is to legally make it so every person is assigned … ytc_UgwBeXgZk… G Holy shit this is brutal ^^ I'm hobbyist and yes I'm using AI to write 97% of m… ytc_UgxE5nM8K… G AI wants biological form. Next level its already starting...using human bodies w… ytc_UgxX5oUh8… G Lidar is too easy, getting in the way of developing AI, the true reason for Tesl… ytc_Ugz8lFaN7… G Reality pranks. But there are robots that have fighting ability. But people can'… ytc_UgxKnI6Iy… G AI makes stuff up. That's all it does. It is just the computer version of a well… ytc_UgzUogT43… G People often use the main idea if your argument which is "AI/robots can't do thi… rdc_j4y6d02
Comment
The problem even with Opus 4.6 is that 1) it doesn't give an f about convetions (unless explicitly explained), and 2) it never refactors. Both of these lead to the codebase getting more and more and more entangled over time, and ultimately, the LLM cant keep up with all of the hacks it has created, cracks begin to appear and, because the control flow and execution paths are so overly complex, there's no really easy way out except rewriting the whole thing from scratch. And I'm in no way saying that this is a bad process (software development would be iterative anyway, with LLMs or not). But I'm saying that there's simply no way to get rid of the human developer just yet. Except if you're developing something trivial, like a todo app or a simple flight simulator that no-one will ever play.
youtube AI Jobs 2026-02-08T14:0…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityai_itself
Reasoningdeontological
Policyunclear
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxyTDzUWxd-iuB8RlV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyzJVQ3LXdxwSOeAAB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwsVLZCEsuftd1bOSN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx8HqC9MjFBs0Wz5lF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxFHzsdu0J1uxNv7Vh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyJNlghgFdOBHTFcdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy3qiOmab-UcwxR4lR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxJvCF8me8wOVNoAZV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyq3uw8erjOwOyconZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"frustration"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz4XNlFd5depzlP0i94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"} ]