Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If you start teaching AI “our values” they will eventually attack humans because…
ytc_Ugwx9ul-Q…
G
i kept looping the last ai video at work today
made me effing lol ill be watchi…
ytc_Ugz5hP615…
G
in machine learning it's called a zero-shot prompt performance. It's when you ex…
ytr_UgxnYGIlx…
G
That pretty much sounds like Sam Alt or possibly Mark Zuck but my money is on Sa…
ytc_UgxIYJLNi…
G
@floppacake9803 just remember that we're seeing Public AI. That version is alw…
ytr_UgzvpHPXY…
G
The bigger companies grow the less productive they become. AI as a tool has noth…
ytc_Ugws0TYsg…
G
I’ve just finished a teacher action research study that draws the conclusion tha…
ytc_UgzUb7npH…
G
I asked Gemini Pro Hannah's exact prompt and here's what it said:
"Look, I get …
ytc_Ugz2IL2J0…
Comment
I don’t know why we (via governmental regulators) even allow vehicles with “future features” on to operate outside of closed test tracks. Tesla is also developing incredibly sophisticated chip technology as part of AI development, but AI is still far below what used be termed the imbecile level. Sure, supercomputers can win at chess and Go, but those are closed sets of rules. One famous example is asking AI to complete a story about someone checking the refrigerator for their favorite fruit drink. Having found they were nearly out, they improvised, mixing two together, say grape and pineapple and then drank it. The AI computer was asked to complete the sentence, “She drank it and…” The computer suggested , “died.” (This was discussed in a Mindscape podcast and video episode awhile ago.) The point is that technology is decades away from reliably mimicking human intelligence, and we should not allow companies to put the public at risk based on what amounts to marketing stunts.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2022-09-04T18:3…
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgysRXa0TvNXwNlYHt14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxO0ulU0eOOzsri_a94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsKPVGGiZ8ZHF4jCF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKtp8583u_0XGDqo54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxR1mIkA0pHiolPdwx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxCHY3MvQMVl9-7bRp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZwABMzNK_5bTT6x14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxix9Fs8d_qmxQWx3x4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwj9kLTK7Tcqg4PDfR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxG-RdjytO-ZEiKpCF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]