Raw LLM Responses

I have some questions that need answering. 1. Why is all your data from old versions? Tesla has not once said the car can drive without human intervention. Mercedes Benz and several other car companies use camera and lidar, but score WORSE on crash test ratings when it comes to detecting objects. I watched a Volvo C40 Recharge plow through a fake child like it wasn’t there. The Model Y stopped perfectly. 2. Seems that the investigators couldn’t tell the difference between autopilot and Full Self Driving. They are two entirely different semi autonomous suites, but that didn’t stop them from using autopilot interchangeably with either. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Before you do a hit piece on Tesla, maybe you should get people who are actually knowledgeable? FSD has been in BETA since February last year. The most recent iteration is entirely different than the system the ex Tesla guy worked on. Gone are the 300k lines of C++ code. No longer does it detect an object and then put it through a database of known object pictures to determine what it is is not…was replaced with an Ai learning neural net. It DOES train itself- the more the cameras see, the more they become accustomed to any and all situations. I have FSD (supervised) and it is way better than the beta. It will see a duck in the road and make corrections. Tesla vision is not what a lot of people here think it means. These “cameras” actually virtualize the world in 360 degrees, and detects depth of objects accurately By the way, autopilot has never stopped at stop signs- it only sends an audible warning. FSD (Supervised) and Actually Smart Summon are next gen- and although they aren’t perfect, they are still hands down THE BEST without a 250k $ clunky goofy looking WAYMO car. I have had many trips without doing a single intervention. Even so, I pay attention to the road