Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G People who rely on AI, their smartphones, whatever, instead of using their own n… ytc_UgxjixURa… G It's simple, the economics do not make sense for OpanAI. Google, Amazon & M… rdc_nsf1ka0 G Why don't we have robot maids? Because labor is crushed and people don't have th… ytc_Ugwv8Vok4… G AI won’t replace jobs, even junior jobs. There is still need of human actions/ap… ytc_Ugz_aBgyG… G When they say God- like AI that's when God will punish planet earth, Read Revela… ytc_UgzVCn7kB… G If cloning is illegal, then AI should definitely be illegal. It would seem to be… ytc_UgzcdTqSy… G As a mother of two kids under 3 years old, technology use in school really scare… ytc_UgyBKQ8-m… G Help him as how? When he is enjoying himself? Doesn't he know was going to happe… ytr_UgwT47SWl…
Comment
Can AI be used by others for nefarious purposes, absolutely. But as for AI becoming dangerous or having it's own motivations, absolutely not. He describes himself as a 'materialist'. In other words he believes intelligence and consciousness is simply an emergent property of a complex system. I don't believe that at all, and there is the distinction. That is why I believe (along with those that think like me) that AI will only ever be able to mimic consciousness and sentience, it won't actually possess it. What's the difference? Well I suppose the difference will be less relevant as time goes on and it becomes better and better at synthesizing true consciousness, but the point is AI systems will always need direction, they cannot 'think' for themselves, they are not and will not ever be 'alive', they are simply algorithms and will always be algorithms. I suppose it boils down to a philosophical argument. But this guy speaks a bit like Richard Dawkins, he's a very materialist 'scientific' thinker. You just don't get the full picture from people that think that way.
youtube AI Governance 2025-06-18T10:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxAO_IOCVQbhMk9u-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxABc89wKbgMpL749R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyOIzl7JK7i_rKNpsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzmV2aSnT-b56-y4Vp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw9pPkyRYE8ZydFldx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx_xR9HrcZOASvOEAJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwTgVeDUcviOfuVPq14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyaF67rd2yp5Rkv3-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzgH5TaGiHsTH7E53d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz_zz4W7muLyeBReKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"} ]