Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The U.N. just held a press conference with a panel of AI that lead to some very …
ytc_Ugx1TON2u…
G
Hello, Alex. Yes, my career HAS been impacted by it. I do royalty-free stock con…
ytc_UgzlFuXsY…
G
Oh thank goodness. Maybe now I won't have to spend a half hour spelling my name …
ytc_Ugz_sEadx…
G
That’s a really sharp point. 🌍
You’re right — humans usually frame morality and…
ytc_UgwdAgsmg…
G
Absolutely! It's fascinating to see how AI, like Sophia, can provide insights th…
ytr_UgyZLk__N…
G
Do you have a job that won't be replaced? well, than i got bad news for you... B…
ytc_UgzwyUJgC…
G
Brother Ruslan KD, put AI in the spot, in the name of Jesus Christ Amen 💯🙏🏽…
ytc_UgzQgS8Pv…
G
Central Texas is having a historic drought. They're looking at having to close t…
ytc_Ugzxss8q0…
Comment
Hello Drew, This "Intelligence Curse" scenario is terrifying because it is mathematically rational for the board. As long as "Efficiency" is the only metric, humans lose every time.
But there is a missing variable in this equation that we need to weaponize: Brand Toxicity.
If a company replaces its workforce with AI, it should not just be a "PR issue"; it should be a Structural Liability.
We need to introduce the concept of "No Fault Redundancy" Protection:
The AI Tax: If a role is automated, the company pays a specific tax that funds the UBI/Retraining for the displaced worker. This removes the "pure profit" incentive of firing them.
The Brand Shield: We need to aggressively support "Human-First" certified companies. If a bank or tech firm purges its staff for bots, the public needs to treat their brand as toxic.
The CEO in your story caved because the cost of keeping humans was higher than the cost of firing them. We need to flip that math. Firing a human for an algorithm should be the most expensive decision a board EVER makes.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-12-04T14:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgxnVl7qsQHr8Npr31F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgwN3B6O8W6SbRTEy2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_Ugyk806Ac8VgInhfsg54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_Ugyb5kzUq0c4zirJQel4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzklGenAO1pfH021ZN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_Ugy-0T8cU6D3Ot4snJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgxU3hkBff4OqEQQfoZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugx9_kA1dPyFbhFNW-B4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgxqgySLYyKfcYvRD0B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugyce_mB-E56xg7xIQZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}]