Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Chatgpt was asked about the oldest universities in the world. The answer exclude… ytc_Ugyd25JwV… G I'm glad AI got people to care about the insanely high professional artist turno… ytc_UgzvAL6Vz… G Really depends on the person. We have a guy in Japan that married a Miku plushie… rdc_nk5fw4c G I just find it weird and ironic how women when victimized by men ask help from o… ytc_UgyCNFHpF… G Ive used ai art generators to flesh out ideas in my head to help with my drawing… ytc_Ugyt1nwYQ… G Remember guys these use batteries and can ignite. Use that information how you w… ytc_Ugw-p1N_E… G 6:10 I'm a biomedical computer scientist and I chose my electives with the focus… ytc_UgxWNSvuA… G Im sure artists will survive AI. I mean... what studio would even hire a AI gene… ytc_UgzO_J91z…

Comment

I think fundamentally a better version of what Google was trying to do should be the way they go forwards. It just needs more training to know when a prompt was specific enough to override the added diversity weights. So when you search “doctor” it should output a wide range of options but when you search “male Japanese doctor” it gives you that. And it also needs to be aware of extra context, for example if you ask it for a current US soldier it should output both male and female versions but ask it for a WW2 US soldier and it should only be male unless you specify female. If you care about the subject’s ethnicity or gender or whatever then specify it and the AI should follow that guidance. If you don’t specify it then what exactly is there to be mad about that it didn’t output a white male? This is far more a failure in execution than a failure in premise.

youtube 2024-02-28T17:5… ♥ 14

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxQT84I9TEhX9fNJmZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGlAs6eDhGd_KoC9V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzpk9UeXHdKK61KP7F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0xnvYRFdJLI8RIYN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzL8-WJrH9gxDnMaPR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwchABnkzTL6ywOd554AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwpGAr4iqyCy7VDmWl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPXejnZosmwaCSB5l4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwJxCooqE4Dx4DQOmB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6LDNfnx15krw3JKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses