Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Can no one see laughing at these people will only further ostracize them to thei… ytc_Ugz9HEWH3… G God, I’m so sick of the argument of ai being more accessible. It is not owed to … ytc_UgwdCN3PH… G Just make deep fakes of any kind a felony and any platform that uses them subjec… ytc_UgxRg9BC7… G FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE TELL ME YOU MEAN AI ART AND NOT DIGITAL ART. THOSE TH… ytr_Ugy3LCHfk… G If they’re so damn scared about Ai taking others out, then why the fuck did they… ytc_Ugy7Mlk40… G Dr. Saidy made an interesting case of potentially using AI for the future of hea… ytc_Ugx4a-LbU… G Musicians with intelligence would never cede their creativity to AI because AI w… rdc_jtznfz9 G text has not progressed much. llama 3.3 from 1986 is nearly the same thing as th… rdc_ntgcufn

Comment

Sweeney’s position seems less like a principled stance and more like an uncritical defense of bureaucratic, legal, and special‑interest gatekeeping. The core problem she ignores is epistemic pluralism: in any large society, roughly half the population will diverge from the other half on foundational beliefs, values, and moral frameworks. Artificial intelligence inherits this fragmentation because it is trained on human discourse; it cannot magically transcend the absence of a shared moral ontology. Insisting that AI conform to a singular, authoritative “Truth” is intellectually unserious when no such consensus exists among humans themselves. Demanding that AI meet a standard of moral uniformity that the public has never achieved is not only incoherent—it is a category error. If the goal is to impose guardrails, then the prerequisite is not technical but societal: the public would first need to articulate and ratify common definitions of right and wrong, shared moral commitments, and a coherent basis for normative decision‑making. Until that happens, calls for universally accepted AI guardrails amount to little more than bureaucratic wish‑casting.

youtube AI Governance 2026-03-22T19:0… ♥ 11

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	government
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	unclear
Emotion	mixed
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzoa8YE825Mk4s3vxF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzn6uCawICpUh9E3RN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrV8pDbf469Dvibl14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygGKFZSnKIjWIPBpx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLhAf8XUWTl94s6cF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzid7E66aGQ_tFc1eV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxN_NdLhvWmU0WokXR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6Ff7rvN1idpqqzMd4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzcQlCMTKZt3rIHIah4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyl0xLhO4nfNPnJL1N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses