Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
And yet here we are already. We have algorithms paperclip-optimizing the human r…
rdc_gd9llot
G
Yeah I admire the ambition but that’s not going to work. The self driving cars w…
ytc_UgysaU8TD…
G
AI, schmay schmy. AI is just another of many things overhyped, overpromised, an…
ytc_UgxD5N7Bo…
G
If we really want to benefit people who want to create, instead of giving them a…
ytr_Ugxbvz4fO…
G
Its a real dumb ethical argument
If you were in a self driving car, the programm…
ytc_Uggqx26B0…
G
Let him tell me about all the tricks he has up his sleeves with midjourney to be…
ytc_UgzrqteGO…
G
Is it just me or why do I think the robot who side eyed the camera Doja Cat? 😭…
ytc_UgxPjCnPt…
G
@John McKeon exactly, there's this fallacy where people believe that new things…
ytr_Ugz9dpLvs…
Comment
One of the issues I experienced when I did a 95%+ LLM code generated frontend (typescript, react, tailwindcss) was that the tailwind css classes was basically "inlined" everywhere in the project and while it looked good at first, eventually as the project scaled it would've been a disaster everytime you wanted to change design/color, because you'd have to track where you'd need to change.
And while the LLM is good at traversing lots of text the context will eventually be too big.
Eventually I had to refactor the codebase and I added some rules and it helped a lot, but it still added "inline" tailwind css classes even though it isn't allowed to do so.
What's the point with all of this; well it is that it's not actually intelligent (like you said in this video too) because if it was it wouldn't keep ignoring the rules. Yes the developer can ignore those kind of rules as well but eventually they'd have to learn whereas the LLM doesn't.
I actually try to steer away from calling it "AI" and stick to "LLM" because it's not actually intelligent.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-01-23T11:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwVkkSfpHzqdRC8IQh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxESdUc0bBM6fVYRGt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuGZTckK001Cowamp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyF0c4FwmZ-KGU29cx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzeXa1EBQRbPGSy-qN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB5gQXOdDeQa2GDqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcNLAf3Zsxwo237aZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwYyPiG3GMzZxf_HzN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3fLYH__kcDTwP2xF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4Wx39RhgRl63gS3h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]