Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If the car is designed to be self-driving entirely. There is no need to have a d…
ytc_Ugxhzhse5…
G
It’s their experiences, emotions, and point of view that makes the art, art.. th…
ytc_UgxKIPuL-…
G
AI and robotics will usher in an age of customization. We will no longer buy mas…
ytc_UgyuFUimm…
G
I'm at 4:00, and it sounds like they will be talking about the infinite paper cl…
ytc_UgwEDAY-B…
G
We appreciate your concern about the future with the rise of robots. It's essent…
ytr_UgwPgetr-…
G
One. It’s ai so they could have sent something normal and the remade it as somet…
ytr_UgyUK2z3g…
G
how 2 comba dis: make dogwater art, ai thingie makes bad art, nobodie user it…
ytc_UgwRT_jCT…
G
the issue with your viewpoint is that the same logic was behind the creation of …
ytr_UgyOMPkxd…
Comment
Elon Musk said, "I think the world should know what was that reason?", which makes me cringe, as it should be "I think the world should know what that reason was." Can you break down his mistake in grammar terms?
ChatGPT
Elon Musk's sentence, "I think the world should know what was that reason?" seems awkward due to the placement of "was." In standard English grammar, the correct structure is "I think the world should know what that reason was."
The mistake lies in the inversion of the subject ("that reason") and the linking verb ("was"). In Musk's sentence, the word order disrupts the typical sequence, making it sound less natural. The corrected version follows the more conventional subject-verb-object order, resulting in a smoother and grammatically correct sentence.
User
I would simply say that he should have used an indirect question rather than what is effectively a sentence fragment and a question bolted together. Am I right?
ChatGPT
Yes, you're absolutely right. Employing an indirect question would have made the sentence clearer and more grammatically sound. Instead of combining a sentence fragment and a direct question, using an indirect question structure would have improved the sentence's coherence and readability.
youtube
AI Governance
2024-01-01T22:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzZURB72pN-H0rj1E14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0rQ6F8W3yOfM5CGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9ucjPjRSa6i5psNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTtmnNWGcKuZlMNCN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6TZlT67za1HQxP4Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwy8vtt-SmOS66rlep4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwumRVU0VKnHdpT_uN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbKfkDOzcD6cdwE0t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwveza6vDs8F_e5-sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3DzDJADYaMeQwrg94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]