Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is the key really. There's lots of evidence showing a logarithmic cap to wh…
rdc_memeo7c
G
I agree. Almost every Job which AI creates will induce a boss to utilize AI for …
ytr_Ugwq5w_O9…
G
Stupid, can't knock out a robot with a fight. Intelligence wasn't part of the fi…
ytc_Ugwwr36VS…
G
Is AI being in control really that much worse than humans being in control? We k…
ytc_UgxTiGjBC…
G
Is there a law on music saying it needs to label AI creations? There should be i…
ytc_Ugwg_-c1W…
G
AI needs electricity to function. The human species doesn’t need it without elec…
ytc_UgwulCNP7…
G
In US jib shedding will haooen twice as fast due to AI and Tariffs! 3 tears from…
ytc_UgwPMcja2…
G
It won’t …if it does mankind will end. AI is not good enough to run civilisation…
ytc_Ugy5PB-fo…
Comment
I am in complete agreement with Dr. Roman, especially when it comes to super intelligence. I find the implications of super intelligence to be terrifying and a threat to the human race. Narrow intelligence, as we have now can be very beneficial to the world. Super intelligence will threaten humans inevitable extinction. Robots don’t need to be fed. They work 24 seven etc. etc.. I have been thinking about how we could program AI and stop super intelligence from destroying the human race Women have an instinctive protection mechanism for their children, just like a she bear will do anything to protect her Cubs if she feels them threaten in any way. In order to protect the human race from extinction, is it possible that we could somehow program AI to incorporate that instinctive protection so that they would not destroy us and look up upon us the same as she bears do with their Cubs and humans do with their children? What do you think of this idea as a security measure against super intelligence?
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T19:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_bV1jwLAjuNilkOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxeb0e3BsIISpa6Qr54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTDdEgXsZ7_fOv1OV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztFGr4QwQqe2QA7kR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfMH21s_XWjLyY2Sx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWStSA1qosnBpGQvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjkcyiXxGHu13gCAt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwx79llVT16gbB0P6Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsGLDsfs5jZMktyDh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJXvUbV2lGnUpDP-B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]