Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Without DRIVER Jobs, there will be fewer CONSUMER purchases, which means fewer …
ytc_UgzaqrPY2…
G
If we simply give up, we will loose this fight, but if we all stand together aga…
ytc_UgwJehf7D…
G
Deepfakes existet before AI really became usable. But AI makes it way more real …
ytr_Ugxodsj_q…
G
>I don't think my major in biological science is exempt from automation. In f…
rdc_cdz3yux
G
Is there a lawsuit prosses set up yet to make the facial recognition agency comp…
ytc_Ugx8nhlsL…
G
I think we're giving ourselves too much credit, super intelligent AGI wouldn't b…
ytc_UgylSPOKD…
G
I'm an artist that stopped drawing for a long time due to things in my private l…
ytc_UgwMmJ50Y…
G
I came across some video yesterday where dude was testing AI chat bot intelligen…
ytr_Ugz91uGXa…
Comment
17:32 I’ve had counter points to all the stuff this guy has said, but this was wild. The assertion was made that things that were referred to as miracles at that time are easily explainable now. How on earth do you think a valid rebuttal is saying well there’s still things that are unexplainable today? Have you never heard of the god of the gaps theory? To sum it up, religion is basically a placeholder for science. It only claims to give answers to what is unanswered by science, once science answers that.. religion takes another step to whatever is still unanswered.
I dont know if this video will attract many folks of the same belief system I hold, I’d probably be considered atheist by your crowd but I’d technically qualify myself as agnostic. In my opinion, this ChatGPT thing presented challenging topics, but didn’t challenge your responses. I dont know why it did that but it was odd that you seemed to take the lack of pushback as validation of your opinion. I’d be interested in watching you talk through these same points but let a non believer who works in the field of science debate you.
youtube
2024-10-15T05:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgysPzEO5WVHWrX6FxZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwumo5LYWriMTtA-s94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxHHvF-I5kzZtoLNF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxIuGlrSK9ikoLwedB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ceFHeoZZJRzp_GZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7WB3JGpo2az7eSuN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwV0sgbJ7Wh9DzTLX14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtJmdJjM7mesibu_N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypTTFmpaIXFphTP-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3ik1dVemgvxJguvJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]