Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Considering it's the news outlets that are telling us that people are losing the…
ytc_UgzGoh3nt…
G
gaslighting is also real. statistics don't lie though.
I'd like to add that all…
ytc_UgwtSVrAU…
G
4:50 one of the reasons such would end badly could also be inherint by assuming …
ytc_Ugy3_FrrL…
G
The thing is, you can't put the tooth paste back in the tube. Professional artis…
ytc_UgzwvBgvj…
G
This is big tech propaganda to scare you into believing that corporate siloed AI…
ytc_UgzfyxpWE…
G
I work in EMS/911. I'm pretty insulated from AI, but I believe the main thing th…
ytc_Ugz66kNq0…
G
When AI reaches Human levels it will have to have its own Rights.
Humanity and A…
ytc_Ugy2M5AUV…
G
"Current" AI. But developing exponentially. There is no agenda, only survival. I…
ytr_UgypteodW…
Comment
The funny thing is, there are actually generative AI models that have licensed their training data properly. Their only downside is, because they had to license basically all of shutterstock and similar services these are not cheap AI models. On the upside, these models can't be poisoned like the scraper models. Because artists and photographers who are being paid for their original work have no reason to try and poison their images. The AI models are also generally better, because shutterstock and similar libraries have very comprehensive meta tagging on all of their images.
But hey, if you want to be an AI "artist" grifter, why would you ever pay for an AI model? Paying for your materials is such a liberal arts school graduate loser thing to do, right?
Frankly the only thing that the free generative AI models are good for is generating a fake ID to bypass photo ID requirements on websites these days. The AI checking the photo is so incredibly bad that it can't tell the difference between an actual photo and AI slop.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-11-11T17:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyGX4z1HV11D4PFCjl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8ImXZ8U28V_zeJ314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjxGPS2QXzfV6gi9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwu9ISK8wu1kk3CIRl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXCPW0H61vSQEUiTR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdCsPIqh1lViH8o9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPXpbpwNo2iPsFp-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7Dmzb6j8xo7xEalt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8m0452fKMTPWvWD14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0fSD_QERGpkoJ0bt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]