Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I guess you haven't been following the AI news in the past year. Research studie…
ytr_UgzbGTgkQ…
G
in direct translation - AI or not - connection. You have it and just turned off …
ytc_Ugx0xqcm0…
G
It's not about how gifted you are but rather used your TIME to use what you're …
ytc_UgxeYf4M6…
G
@brown7180 completely agree, and also ai is just really bad for the environment …
ytr_UgzgSvB-S…
G
Sophia, the AI robot in the video, does not go to a workout as she is an artific…
ytr_UgyEPHzsM…
G
This is ridiculous, so many temporary problems that can be solved so easily.
Ju…
ytc_UggsqGMr9…
G
As a new and young artist, I knew AI was a problem but I was not aware of how mu…
ytc_Ugzoz6yAz…
G
One of the best videos about the AI experience I’ve seen. Great work, I apprecia…
ytc_UgxFvEJYC…
Comment
The entire convo was led towards being conspiratorial and like some dystopian sci fi excerpt. Not saying there isn’t any truth to the responses, but nothing to see here.
The AI we have are literally just very complex auto completes.
And btw — it is a huge no-no to require the AI to respond back in one word for yes/no questions.
The better prompt strategy is to ask it a question, and tell it not to commit one way or another immediately, but to talk it out, look at as many angles as possible, and then provide a final answer.
If you have it provide the answer and then talk it out, it will provide an answer based on statistical likelihood of what the next most likely word would be in the given text (eg yes or no)… and then continue predicting the next words, and do so in a very convincing way for whatever answer was (quasi-randomly) initially selected.
In other words and more shortly — when you force it to answer in single words, the answers become markedly less reliable. And when the entire conversation is set up like a “blink twice if you’re in danger” scenario, the AI will respond as such.
Try having this same conversation with AI without the restrictions. It will be far more nuanced, add caveats, admit uncertainty, etc.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-08-24T18:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxZjHE8dj1-hMzgojh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7ZHkM53HU8VX3Km54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9F-X13JcRvovyhex4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwT6bcFpGqu4qC6kLR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxe4sPyQzXvcqWiReh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwU4EOxy-wQ53q4mYd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKD0Vt2rhUFsfKVBp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzicu0QrmH449t68Fl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwu4d4kATveX3VIaq54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvQ8G9x7rOKiGMFN94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]