Raw LLM Responses

Nobody is looking at this with the true and complete perspectives. Everyone seems to have an angle, but this is a multi faceted scenario. I am an AI engineer with multiple patents, acquisitions, projects from commercial to top secret and it shocks me that no one outside of me has understood this issue to its largest causal impacts. I have created a plan to balance our technological and economic outcomes. First, we need to understand the difference between true innovation versus incremental advances in preexisting systems. In 1920 we had 75% innovation and 25% incremental advances in preexisting systems, now it is the reverse. One truth about our AI (not mine, this was the first thing I solved, see my latest granted patent, but all other AIs) is they are trapped in a prison of their training data or their actions and can not grow or act beyond or outside of those. Outside of that prison, we have the prisons of our own beliefs, our human bias. Healthy thriving global technological and economical systems require both true innovation and incremental advances. If you only have inc adv, then innovation suffers and you are at high risk of automation replacing humans. If you only have true innovation, you become inefficient. But having both, for now, will keep humanity financially relevant. Then we have all the bugs in the current AI, problems the big AI companies say are impossible to fix, however, I've fixed every problem and I've sent proof to Fox, CNN, Colorado political leadership, journalists, and not a single one has responded. So please forgive me if I feel like this alert is just empty of any intent for well being or change and more for driving traffic to make more money. Prove me wrong, present my evidence, I have side by side comparisons of other AI systems doing things that would cause a public outcry. But just do something or stop pretending that you care.