Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Everything is good unless they go bad idk why human want robot's I guess they wa…
ytc_UgzkQo3_i…
G
AI is so intelligent that it couldnt give me a correct instruction on where to f…
ytc_UgxbrQ7XZ…
G
all would be fine if ai only generated low res images and with art thats free to…
ytc_UgyeRbwyf…
G
They all have mostly the same data. Google and Microsoft scrape all the Facebook…
rdc_kojzvuo
G
Not that it isnt bad, but people with character ai fixations were already shut o…
ytr_UgwFE-FHa…
G
4:35 Nice! 😂
Lucky the Tesla doesn't have an automatic weapon to deploy because…
ytc_UgwOU0zMV…
G
I laugh at people who think AI can replace a worker. Its just a hype driven fant…
ytc_UgzcnUm0Z…
G
This is going to be a disaster. We already saw what happened to social media. AI…
ytc_UgzaT3cF0…
Comment
I fully understand the concept of training bias and the importance of being aware of it and avoiding it. However, one should not assume that, since the human resume reviewers, and then the AI, tended to pick men at a greater rate than women, that this represents a bias problem. Whatever those characteristics (other than gender specifically) were, they may have, indeed, selected the ideal candidates in the vast majority of cases. Those humans, and AIs, may have picked the most successful candidate again and again. So, if you reject the result, just because women are selected at a lower a random population might suggest, you could be settling for a sub-optimal process instead. In fact, if you're not careful, you could continually tweak your process until you get to the point that you are semi-consciously introducing bias FOR women by rejecting any solution that doesn't select them at a proportionate rate.
youtube
AI Bias
2021-09-17T00:0…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwDW3MEKUQRg5cYVQt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugws_d2Y-7hbfgM5h_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBj0WUHpEKWZTnKB14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyujJa0atwPZIGzyap4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyz7L92AER4HUs36ol4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJm5cmf8UQXUUVjWh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAuySIDzFI1lyx2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkPjlTScz2Yn_XgQd4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMBK_LdH17XO8Qaah4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzs4fUmt_E3je34Pf14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]