Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Elon .. que le dirías a la gente . Cuál sería el trabajo a considerar. ..
Elon…
ytc_Ugw7dpX1g…
G
“Wake up in the morning, put on my face. The one that’s gonna get me, through an…
ytc_UgzAJq5nv…
G
Great video good info in this one. So, here’s what I see for whatever that’s wor…
ytc_Ugy3M3sYZ…
G
@khalistani-Chad it just goes to show how little some men actually know what a r…
ytr_Ugz5X1VwB…
G
I have been a holdout in seeing the benefits but just last week started using Ch…
rdc_n7h6g3c
G
That's why you get a local AI that you can install on your PC or a laptop that n…
ytc_UgxZDNIKO…
G
I’ve been using ChatGPT a fair amount for programming, and it’s like having an u…
rdc_n00e942
G
* here’s how to fix it.
-
Always tell ChatGPT to look it up so that way it’s usi…
ytc_UgwXqgzCG…
Comment
The case of second parties "laundering" work that later turned out to be from an original source has happened a lot within standard copyright cases of the past.
The important question is whether the final party that utilised the work reasonably knew that copyright infringement was taking place, or whether they had no reason to believe that the work was derivative.
Say you used a copyright-free sounds pack in your game, but one of the sounds turned out to be copy written. You can claim that you thought it was safe, but if there's evidence the company knows it's not (which could be obtained in a subpoena), then they have no shot.
https://youtu.be/0twDETh6QaI?si=i71kgE6GJ0i-48Jn&t=1012 Has an interesting case of this for the "Oof" noise. I think with the weight of evidence that work has been stolen, either AI is going to break or Copyright Law is. My money's on the Mouse.
youtube
2026-01-28T13:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3t05x1517cZMBRC14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxN9LsTxR-AMqoVlFN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwk0armAw-cKkRW4rN4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwpF-rU7KjEtbf2ygp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoEjuSWUbBxMFuHdV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiJIXe5g1VVY31KU94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgweZvspL3k0ZZMzMq14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyp2Bc9KAv5943qmdJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4DSCK-injV33hC-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSp3RzBp-XbVs3zih4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]