Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Bro... chat gpt can be useful yes but. It is not very smart, if your asking abou…
ytc_UgzC5ci0o…
G
A.I. has and will continue to advance people's projects... Thank you. Good answe…
ytc_UgwBjS6x-…
G
to everyone talking about how expensive therapy is: there are SO MANY OTHER OPTI…
ytc_Ugy53XT36…
G
Actually, I haven't heard a single English speaker ever refer to left wingers as…
rdc_da40weu
G
I had a friend in Germany who used a telegram channel to Deepfake a photo of me …
ytc_UgwvhNlwF…
G
Some of you making negative comments have young kids that will have to grow up i…
ytc_Ugz93qncW…
G
I remember when Black Sabbath and Judas Priest (I believe) were sued over their …
ytc_Ugz9MOF2K…
G
If AI kills all the jobs, who’s left to buy the products—corporations selling to…
ytc_Ugzr8mbWu…
Comment
Question about how different/novel this situation actually is.
Lawyers often have _human_ assistants -- junior partners, paralegals, interns, whatever -- to whom they farm out case-law research tasks, right?
You mention "placeholder arguments". I'm guessing this means you'd say, "assuming I can find a case-law citation saying X, then..." and then you'd write a few paragraphs of argument based on that, and meanwhile your assistant is burning midnight oil searching for a citation to fill in the blank. Am I close?
Well then... consider a situation where one of these assistants screws up -- either making the "human error" of misinterpreting a case, or less understandably, deciding to just fabricate something real-sounding to satisfy your query.
And then you include that in the argument you present in court.
And get called on it.
Q: How does this situation differ from one in which the "assistant" is ChatGPT?
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-06-11T05:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxGo27u7ONF6cXfpeJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzL3NIefV2bWDtN2At4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3y-DofzAmDHY2cIJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmiXz878yGbZ9fhcB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzP2zFRbYxRoPP5KvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLXb5GQQIMwfQI9NJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLOgVgADR38zbjT114AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCLFYV-TO_2XIMZwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwpoE099XWtdDJewIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyJvsWH7ku0atYvXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"none","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]