Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G There is a chance that Sam Altman of OpenAI as well as whoever is behind Anthrop… ytr_Ugw1xsTpr… G This... This is the real reason euthanasia for any "unbearable circumstances" is… ytc_UgzaILMAL… G @pd9935 Agreed 100% that AI should be seen as a tool, rather than just a free … ytr_UgxpfOdev… G We appreciate your feedback. If you have any specific concerns or questions abou… ytr_UgyJsYCHx… G My 15 year nursing career over 4 states, two countries and multiple specialties … ytc_Ugy4-stwO… G If you eliminate all dramatic and suffering events from the training you will ha… ytc_Ugz9tyOSX… G It's great to see your enthusiasm! The interaction in the video showcases AI's a… ytr_UgwejxCUb… G The Moonshot Mates continue to stun with this episode. Your adept coverage of te… ytc_Ugz04S7BF…

Comment

See, this video is really disappointing to me. Not the content itself, but rather because of the thesis of the video: that AI is theft. This YouTuber has shown that they can clearly be nuanced, as with their Apollo 13 video, but the fact that they have shown that they're capable and willing to alter their standards simply because of the subject matter's emotional weight is... concerning. It also seems like despite the research done to make this video, the thesis remained unchanged. What I'm saying is that this YouTuber made a thesis first (which is common) before looking at the evidence. Then, they looked for claims and parts of truth that supported their thesis, instead of making a thesis *after* looking at the evidence. TL;DR Great potential, disappointing execution EDIT: I really should've mentioned the personal attacks in this video as well, but I mean, you don't even have to look for them. Just watch maybe 10, 20 minutes, and you'll hear at least one. I'm sure Shadiversity also had at least one in his video, but the fact that ad hominems in this video is a bad sign.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2026-01-15T02:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	developer
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	unclear
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgwgLs3ngNT6pYTNRy94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disappointment"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQCXW8lF8UQH-z2xh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUAjwE0qz_SHSVcsR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwh1NpQpKqlGORFchh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwufCHNwlt8DzTvTwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynK_U2ASy-YJbCsm54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVeDtVaDyH7ggsVgJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSMXq4C8uyrIEV7GN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRtJpihDB7KDxEg6p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeT04zGIuwbye7BqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses