Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Oh... I assumed virtually everyone with any power is using AI now to try and man…
rdc_nw81vzf
G
The chat bot intentionally goes out of it's way to NOT speak clearly. Sounds ju…
ytc_Ugxlok_zy…
G
I think he Meant A year 🫠😂😂I just Watched a clip about some ai creator QuiTTing …
ytc_Ugz0lCW1p…
G
And than the student gets in a different ai platform that is not regulated....a…
ytc_UgyXffEd-…
G
Yes, maybe this video though not what they are planning. Has one forgotten what…
ytr_UgxaHdB-C…
G
No one was a robot in “They Live”. They were aliens, but I get it.…
ytc_UgzLaU0tf…
G
AI will need us, we are the most complex biological mechanisms for them to under…
ytc_Ugx5eBNXr…
G
My university program has gone as far as allowing some use of LLMs to write your…
ytc_Ugy2MAXSl…
Comment
What Yampolskiy is doing here isn’t new — it’s part of a very old media pattern. Fear-based narratives always generate reach, and platforms reward exactly this dynamic. The more extreme the prediction, the higher the engagement. It’s not about truth; it’s about amplification.
Interviews with catastrophists almost always go viral because fear is a reliable attention engine. Hosts benefit from boosted view counts, guests benefit from publicity, and the entire system rewards emotional extremity over balanced analysis. It’s not a conspiracy — it’s just how the attention economy works.
This is why these conversations often sound more like metaphysics dressed as engineering. The emotional certainty, the doomsday tone, the “I know something others don’t” framing — these are classic storytelling techniques for capturing attention, not scientific argumentation. The risks of AI are real, but turning speculative scenarios into guaranteed disasters is a business model, not a research methodology.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-11-27T11:4…
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy56i3yCvIS1H-iQeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1tWrtiZh4KkuVGtZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEOJkDfdoFKcdAyGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfqBlH55FsMXp08YN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZWrR4HhsShzB4iFd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ0lKO7zFNfw7ArY54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybKGti21A2jgR423R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx5AFYoHo6He3wwdlZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuAEPdg1iTmQYX45p4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQyI4PKDnhc11i59N4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]