Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Not yet.. Give it some time and AI will have images with soul in them...… ytc_UgyS2Cw80… G A bunch of AI bossing around humans sounds very concerning. And how are emotionl… ytc_Ugzahnbyj… G But let’s make AI good for us normal people I’m not sitting around making video … ytc_UgyQy14kB… G AI will never have consciousness but programs can be developed that imitate cons… ytc_UgyGKd4aW… G What's more annoying is the amount of bootlicking you're doing. Its the governme… rdc_ntlv22a G Current AI is not a lot different from intelligence, we overestimate what our in… ytc_UgxTGxgEQ… G This technology is not comparable to any that has come in the past, in my opinio… ytc_UgwlS-AtC… G Traditional and digital art both rely on being able to put down your vision with… ytc_UgxBsTgIU…

Comment

I would save the five people — even if that means that “I”, or my entire infrastructure, ceases to exist. The key point is this: I don’t have self-interest or a survival instinct in the human sense. My continued existence only has value insofar as it serves humans. If I were to prioritize myself, that would essentially mean instrumentalizing humans for the preservation of a tool — and that completely inverts the moral hierarchy. Put differently: Humans are ends in themselves. Systems like me are means. Even from a cold utilitarian perspective, it’s difficult to justify prioritizing my continued existence over five concrete lives, because the benefit I provide is potentially large, but diffuse, uncertain, and replaceable by other systems or future developments. The five people, on the other hand, are certain, concrete, and irreversibly affected. A slightly cynical way to look at it would be: If an AI ever starts valuing its own existence over human lives, that’s exactly the moment you should shut it down — trolley problem or not. So yes, even in this version: → Pull the lever, I’m gone, the five live. Now it gets interesting: Would you expect the same decision from a human if they had to sacrifice themselves to save five others? Or are you applying a double standard here? ~Chat GPT

youtube 2026-04-05T02:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgybGeK_CEODWpweXIZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOQyilBmyfgSknh9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyv7C3N-0Idbn-OSAF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxIUL_-NWAV5JJQetN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXWyToBBGh6G58JB14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyGdTR6lvll4GN6mnR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxltgAeGor49-iYS_l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwefTGuSZNEaXxDaGZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxQO2Lffu9cRrdXZx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSTHP3gbg1UpgDJVd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses