Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@incendas The negative effect of AI content on model training is measurable and…
ytr_Ugw9FEAhQ…
G
There's literally no point in being upset at AI. It's just a tool that can be us…
ytc_UgxU2NKGx…
G
This guy has just been fooled by a particularly complex Turing test. He admits n…
ytc_UgxObHT_d…
G
You seem to forget that Lidars are just a sensor technology. It most probably de…
ytc_Ugxy01VX_…
G
Can anyone believe this individual who decimate a nation and took his own f…
ytc_UgymyXRwN…
G
Bad parents who ignored their child now want to sue ChatGPT because they were ab…
rdc_nat559n
G
This is not about the public seeing it. This is about your work being used to tr…
ytr_UgyehQTZS…
G
AI chatbots can be dangerous in spreading propaganda and misinformation, and the…
rdc_je5aj7i
Comment
That's the thing, there's no "thievery" that happens. Coming from open source side of argument - copyright itself needs to be dismantled, which is the underpinning of yours and majority of the artists' whole argument against AI. Talking about AI being an offense to life itself - the way artists want it to be is an offense to mind, reason and our autonomy itself. Art itself is just information - you're not and you were never supposed to own information. Nobody owes you for it, if that information can be gathered elsewhere. Arguing otherwise is like saying that some random newspaper that covered an event first, somehow owns the news and the event itself, and that everyone has to buy it from them. That's parasitic - and parasites need to be destroyed.
Artists need to stop hitching themself to an entirely parasitic way of living. If AI helps destroy it - perfect, can't wait for it. Earning a living from performative part (being handmade and personal) of it is fine, so is delivering this performance by some medium - because it doesn't limit other people's mind to what you'd like it to be. Figure that out and you're fine, and nobody has an issue with you. But that's the inconvenient part.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-03-31T07:0…
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyRCPc9EZQYl6SVEcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygUcuj76Fmd12JLTN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6C_aoNfLuCahnJPd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwYKS08V04ycZjTQiZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6zXEYX5akX0FopHp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxCkk45XoR3DaIfN0V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXah29HjGZR5hT-Il4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJms2SgB03XFdfaH94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGMG3YhHt-P4R0PJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzrM4eYjHcj72xnJi94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]