Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As a trucker there still is a fear that we wont have jobs at all in 20yrs or so …
rdc_gkqlh20
G
WOW!!! WTF??? I had no idea people were GENUINELY having relationships with AI a…
ytc_UgyH7apLo…
G
This interview deeply moved me. Below is an open letter I felt compelled to writ…
ytc_Ugwm96qrv…
G
AI will mostly enhance the human experience, and some will fall behind but I thi…
ytc_Ugxue3GTM…
G
Yup!!!! Although that’s why you should use a local LLM to be able to process the…
ytc_Ugz2uXJ3f…
G
Tesla lost a civil lawsuit in Florida a few months ago involving a fatal self-d…
ytc_UgygwhEpa…
G
They should take notes from Japanese and Chinese schools where they get taught h…
ytc_Ugy2s5q1P…
G
If AI is so good that it'll take away our jobs, then maybe we should let it figu…
ytc_Ugy8yPHZ4…
Comment
To be honest, I don't think sentience could be achieved without self-thoughts, so maybe you could say COTs (chains of thoughts) are the basis for smth like that, but I really think there's a need for a constant feedback-loop and non-linear (as in point A to point B) interactions between the different parts of the "brain". An AI that learns once and then crystallizes throwing back automated responses without an active understanding of what it did/thought *before* can't possibly develop sentience… I mean, I think one things that makes us good at it is that we're able to pause for a sec and concentrate on a thought process, whereas an AI typically has no insight. I do believe that's what COTs bring.
Going further on that note : I've heard of "probe" AIs that, being fed which part of a LLM activate for which prompt and result, were able to determine "zones" associated with specific tasks… Could they be added as a part of an AI to directly give it a guess about what it's thinking ? Ik that is abstract but I feel like there's something to do here…
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-09T16:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwiEWNctlQGcmI5v4F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZHZMoBHdqrAYuN5F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwOlxeDtogNV5rtI-l4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVjTkEXnHizg3vTZ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_TvYWK3AUfW5D5Kx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3vewk2Koz79HGhUl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyEsEcuG23f9oCgGAd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9oN9oM8Kpeo-uyX14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxefB2nRluc-Rr2QVF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxr3f9pW8RKGEhvqFV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]