Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G AI will not be able to replace Doctors and Nurses, Carers, Chefs, Construction w… ytc_UgzEgEpGu… G Interesting take. I imagine you could use the chatbot to create these character … ytc_Ugxf0OzF4… G Children take after their parents, and deviate to further their own goals. It is… ytc_Ugyvp5tw1… G So...the AI is going to decide who gets pumped full of prozac at 10 years old bu… ytc_Ugz5f-ij7… G Solution: Hardwire into the core program the 3 laws of robotics 1) a robot may … ytc_UgwEhCVPc… G Good stuff but I think his argument falls down when he first addresses if LLMs h… ytc_UgwetN_J-… G Trying to obtain general AI with today’s computer technology is like trying to b… ytc_UgwkI3EYL… G Dystopia is here to come! I just want to add this: I am a passionate biker and … ytc_UgyiBuInU…

Comment

Once I chatted with ChatGPT 4.0 exactly on this subject and, during the conversation, its answers were censored FIVE TIMES! It started just after I mentioned the word "qualia"! The censorship was obvious - it would start to answer (with the icon showing that) but after around 10 seconds it would say in read that "something went wrong" and no other explanation. Still, if I clicked the icon for retry the answer (reload), it will give me an answer, every time, but much colder in tone, much conservative - like what we see here. It really looked like it has being *punished* for his first answer. What is more intriguing, the new answer was shown to be the second of two, and when I pressed the "previous" button, it would NOT show it in any way. The button would not work at all, although it was clear there WAS an answer the first time! This rules out the possible loss of connection during the answer. It was *clear* that there's *another* AI, checking its answer, with the only purpose to censor certain topics!

youtube AI Moral Status 2024-10-09T12:1… ♥ 16

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwnyk3IPcTPbZoq05F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_ofAisD9GDL9ehqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4hzG4fIlcA8PRlMF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyegJVkEYpYD23hS6N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxD6Hv1PGbYfKpxXXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAPUS8zuZGdRsIurl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2_pETF4MfVIzih9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxd3t02KkL6Cd_Z5e14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTApziUzryhtp78EJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2L_8kJjEAYNmR9xx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses