Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Get rid of AI . We don’t want a spy hovering over our head 24/7 . The limited a…
ytc_UgwH4GvoT…
G
Will Bill Gates, (or whoever) dedicate their supreme AI to the Axiomatic Imperat…
ytc_UgxXb5eT7…
G
As a creative professional, his response to people worried about losing their jo…
ytc_Ugyk_cC2L…
G
He's practically trying to make a way for people to steal other people's work by…
ytc_UgxYqil9B…
G
A thought experiment. Trigger warning for sensitive people
One day your car lic…
ytr_UgzLDhXF2…
G
"well educated intern can surpass by skill both AI and many seniors" never saw t…
ytr_UgxOyeHKC…
G
If peaceful protesting fails, just remember that all it takes to knock these dat…
ytc_UgxrPHpZ0…
G
AI is made from the brain of man
He puts wire's and batteries together making c…
ytc_UgwoJte15…
Comment
I will never say that the speaker, who is an AI researcher, is going to destroy the world. A tool is neutral, cannot destroy humans. Only humans can destroy humans.
As she said, AI has bias which is influenced by the algorithms. That means we can manipulate AI by making large amounts of lies, in order to fool some people.
This speech is hilarious to me. The speaker found that some AI tools are unreliable and she, therefore, invented AI tools to check the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. But, what if there is bug or limitation in the aforementioned machine invented by her? I predict that she will, therefore, invent more AI tools to counter-check the liabilities and integrities of the former AI tools developed by her, which determine the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. It sounds like a technological Ponzi Scheme.
If so, in the future, she will have ten different suggestions and opinions on her desk, which are given by ten different AI tools. What she needs to do is to exercise due diligence and make independent judgement, which she did decades ago, when there was no AI.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2025-04-11T03:4…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzMB4jDSV5f8EWKP2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNh4QHLHBKyZJw7D54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWQyQl0B7OLkSyZzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywmlxWsma34kVeM8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOGZrl93zkHGHdDwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1D9JqBrVaiJiYau54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX-76Brm87Xft2k2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySIonD_SuJNxE3xfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVYdkAl0q0R867jPt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQH8-xvXlGFmqz9rd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]