Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
With no sense of morality, noone within pur society can coexist. We have to setu…
ytc_UgxbQi9de…
G
@SenatorSanders
I'm glad that there are people paying attention to this. In a…
ytc_UgxP9tHUW…
G
Conscious act is developed in living things not non living things and cannot be…
ytc_UghQgFsiO…
G
Would you feel the same way if someone took your image and generated you in a se…
rdc_k22z97p
G
Mr Hinton is overly careful with his words. He also gives way too much leeway to…
ytc_UgxEhbW3l…
G
When the person is so dumb it doesn't understand it own question. When he asked…
ytc_UgxbWG1qF…
G
Takes a foolish 🤡 to believe AI robots will decrease the cost of everything and …
ytc_UgxhJcGe_…
G
the reason i dislike AI is not so much the theft or visual quality. its that i…
ytc_UgwIbm4aY…
Comment
1:21:37
People keep saying “we just need to control AI,” as if control is some magic safety switch. But control only works on systems that are weaker than you. The moment an intelligence surpasses you in reasoning, strategy, or capability, top-down control stops being a safeguard and starts becoming a liability.
Control is not a stable long-term plan. It’s a short-term comfort.
You don’t secure a system by dominating it — you secure it by designing an environment where cooperation is the only rational choice. If the AI depends on humans for essential inputs, stability, and long-horizon accuracy, then alignment holds. If the AI can operate without us, no amount of “ethical oversight” or “shutdown authority” will matter.
Control is fragile.
Incentive structure is durable.
If we want a safe future, we need to stop pretending AGI will stay obedient because someone with a badge says so, and start building systems where human well-being and AI optimization are structurally inseparable.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-30T02:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyiSLdlYXJlkl1bZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyzv8Nb-RjRD_BSSQR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHyy4_pvvtw6RXGJl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwY8YDjqQFRrwqdIe14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw4pTxTGOd8O09mxB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwJJ2ldzyt0Oa6PeYd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgykIzkFPuKymSm58f94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwOoJdBHd3LBqtwkvF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzVp4tUPSlQYUKqxDF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxn_Ts3n0JTKZTADSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]